65 — 8 (46) 2022 — Mamadalieva G.I., Ruzieva N.Kh., THE IMPORTANCE OF USING CIN-DIAG IN DIAGNOSTICS

THE IMPORTANCE OF USING CIN-DIAG IN DIAGNOSTICS

Mamadalieva G.I., Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute

Ruzieva N.Kh., Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute

Resume

Benign diseases of the cervix (BCD) are morphofunctional pathologies of the mucous membrane of the cervix (BM), in which the normoplasia of the epithelium is preserved. The concept of DSC includes ectopic columnar epithelium of the cervix (CC), cervical erosion, ectropion, cervical leukoplakia, as well as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with low and high degree of squamous intraepithelial lesions (CIN I and II). DZSHM in the structure of gynecological diseases account for 25-45%. The study of risk factors for precancerous processes of cervical cancer and cervical cancer is essential both from the point of view of the health of each individual woman and the female population as a whole, and hence the composition of the population and the birth rate in it.

Keywords: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, risk factors

First page

392

Last page

398

For citation: Mamadalieva G.I., Ruzieva N.Kh., THE IMPORTANCE OF USING CIN-DIAG IN DIAGNOSTICS //New Day in Medicine 8(46)2022 392-398 https://l.clck.bar/14886

LIST OF REFERENCES:

  1. Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Петрова Г.В. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2018 году. – Минздрав России. 2019. – 236с.
  2. Мамадалиева Г.И., Рузиева Н.Х. Влияния факторов риска развития цервикальная интраэпителиальной неоплазии // Тиббиетда янги кун. – 2021. -№6 (38/1). –С.596-601.
  3. Прилепская В.Н. Заболевания шейки матки и генитальные инфекции: / М: ГЭОТАР-Медиа. 2016. – 384 с
  4. Рахманова Ж.А. Эпидемиологические особенности рака шейки матки // Евразийский вестник педиатрии. – 2019. – №3. – с.238-244
  5. Роговская С.И. Практическая кольпоскопия. – М.: ГЭОТАР- Медиа, 2011. – 240с
  6. Савельева Г.М., Сухих Г.Т., Серов В.Н., Радзинский В.Е. Национальное руководство по гинекологии. / М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2017. 989 с.
  7. Benard V. B. et al. Population-based incidence rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in the human papillomavirus vaccine era //JAMA oncology. – 2017. – Т. 3. – № . 6. – С. 833-837., doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3609
  8. Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bosze P, Girardi F, Haefner H. et al. 2011 IFCPC colposcopic nomenclature. In preparation for publication // https://ifcpc.org/newWP/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/nomenclature7-11.pdf
  9. Mark K, Frost A, Hussey H, Lopez-Acevedo M, Burke AE. Rates of regression of cervical dysplasia between initial biopsy and excisional procedure in routine clinical practice. // Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019. – №299(3). – р.841-846
  10. Polman NJ, Ebisch RMF, Heideman DAM, Melchers WJG, Bekkers RLM. Performance of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse: a randomised, paired screen-positive, non-inferiority trial. // Lancet Oncol. 2019. – №20(2). – р.229-238
  11. Polman NJ, Snijders PJF, Kenter GG, Berkhof J. HPV-based cervical screening: Rationale, expectations and future perspectives of the new Dutch screening programme. // Prev Med. 2019. – №119. – р.108-117
  12. Sanad A.S., Kamel H. H., Hasan M. M. Prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in patients attending Minia Maternity University Hospital //Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. – 2014. – Т. 289. – №. 6. – р. 1211-1217., Jun. , doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-3109-0.;
  13. Shahida S.M. et al. Prevalence of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in four Upazila of Dhaka Division // Mymensingh medical journal: MMJ. – 2019. – Т. 28. – №. 3. – p. 655.

file

download