• Home
  • NEW DAY MEDICINE
  • 9 (47) 2022
  • 34 — 9 (47) 2022 — Axmedjanov D.U., Karimov A.A., Arifjanov I.A., FEATURES OF THE NEAREST POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD IN MICROSURGICAL TREATMENT OF LUMBAR COMPRESSION RADICULOPATHY

34 — 9 (47) 2022 — Axmedjanov D.U., Karimov A.A., Arifjanov I.A., FEATURES OF THE NEAREST POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD IN MICROSURGICAL TREATMENT OF LUMBAR COMPRESSION RADICULOPATHY

FEATURES OF THE NEAREST POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD IN MICROSURGICAL TREATMENT OF LUMBAR COMPRESSION RADICULOPATHY

Axmedjanov D.U., Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute

Karimov A.A., Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute

Arifjanov I.A., Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute

Resume

A prospective analysis was carried out. The study was based on the results of treatment of 120 patients with lumbar compression radiculopathy from January 5, 2020 to November 2021. The main study group consisted of 60 patients (32 men, 28 women), the average age was 43.2 (from 22 to 65) years. The comparison group also consisted of 60 patients (34 men and 26 women), mean age 45.9 years. In the main group, the tubular technique was used, and in the comparison group, the method of discectomy according to W.Caspar. The mean scores in assessing back pain on the VAS visual analogue scale at the time of admission of patients to inpatient treatment averaged 6.5±0.68 and 6.68±0.68 in the main and comparison groups, respectively.

Keywords: lumbar compression radiculopathy, microsurgical treatment, tubular method, W.Caspar technique, results, postoperative period

First page

203

Last page

210

For citation: Axmedjanov D.U., Karimov A.A., Arifjanov I.A., FEATURES OF THE NEAREST POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD IN MICROSURGICAL TREATMENT OF LUMBAR COMPRESSION RADICULOPATHY //New Day in Medicine 9 (47)2022 203-210 https://l.clck.bar/abb86

LIST OF REFERENCES:

  1. Sohrab Virk et al. How do high preoperative pain scores impact the clinical course and outcomes for patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy? // Journal of neurosurgery. Spine. 2020; 1-7. doi:10.3171/2020.5.SPINE20373.
  2. Hoang Duc Luan, Nguyen Thanh Hai, Pham Thu Xanh, Hoang Thi Giang, Pham Van Thuc, Nguyen Mai Hong, and Pham Minh Khue Musculoskeletal Disorders: Prevalence and Associated Factors among District Hospital Nurses in Haiphong, Vietnam // Hindawi BioMed Research International Volume 2018, Article ID 3162564, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3162564/
  3. Muthu, Sathish et al. “Is Endoscopic Discectomy the Next Gold Standard in the Management of Lumbar Disc Disease? Systematic Review and Superiority Analysis.” // Global spine journal vol. 11,7 (2021): 1104-1120. doi:10.1177/2192568220948814
  4. Zhang, Bin et al. “Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microdiscectomy for lumbar discherniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” // Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research vol. 13,1 169. 5 Jul. 2018, doi:10.1186/s13018-018-0868-0
  5. Meyer, Guilherme et al. “Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Pain, Disability, and Complication Rate-A Randomized Clinical Trial.” // International journal of spine surgery vol. 14,1 72-78. 29 Feb. 2020, doi:10.14444/7010
  6. Qin, Rongqing et al. “Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Posterior Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.” // World neurosurgery vol. 120 (2018): 352-362. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.236
  7. Siccoli A., Schröder M.L., Staartjes V.E. Association of age with incidence and timing of recurrence after microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation. // Eur Spine J. 2021;30(4):893-898. doi:10.1007/s00586-020-06692-1
  8. Guilherme B.F. Porto., Cisewski S.E., Wolgamott L., Frankel B.M. Clinical outcomes for patients with lateral lumbar radiculopathy treated by percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy versus tubular microdiscectomy: A retrospective review. // Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021;208:106848. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106848

file

download