100 -12 (50) 2022 — A.P. Alimov, S.Yu. Yusupov — ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM RESULTS AFTER SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURES

ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM RESULTS AFTER SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURES

A.P. Alimov, Republican Center for Specialized Traumatology and Orthopedic Scientific and Applied Medicine (RITOIATM), Tashkent sh. Scientific Center for Emergency Medicine of the Republic, Bukhara branch.

S.Yu. Yusupov, Republican Center for Specialized Traumatology and Orthopedic Scientific and Applied Medicine (RITOIATM), Tashkent sh. Scientific Center for Emergency Medicine of the Republic, Bukhara branch.

Sh.K. Khakimov Republican Center for Specialized Traumatology and Orthopedic Scientific and Applied Medicine (RITOIATM), Tashkent sh. Scientific Center for Emergency Medicine of the Republic, Bukhara branch.

Resume

A comparative analysis of long-term clinical and functional results after various methods of treating fractures of the proximal femur of the sternum shows a number of positive and beneficial side operations of periosteal osteosynthesis of minimally invasive plasty using an external distraction device. developed in the clinic and considered as one of the modern methods of traumatology.

Key words: osteosynthesis, osteoporosis, proximal epimetaphysis

First page

570

Last page

575

For citation: A.P. Alimov, S.Yu. Yusupov, Sh.K. Khakimov – ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM RESULTS AFTER SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURES //New Day in Medicine 12(50)2022 570-575 https://clck.ru/33DXHC

LIST OF REFERENCES:

  1. Елдзаров П.Е., Зелянин А.С., Филиппов В.В. Оперативное лечение больных с последствиями переломов плечевой кости. //Хирургия. 2010; (9): 47–52.
  2. Минаев А.Н., Городниченко А.И., Усков О.Н. Чрескостный остеосинтез переломов проксимального метаэпифиза плечевой кости у пациентов пожилого и старческого возраста. //Хирургия. 2010; (1): 50–53.
  3. Хакимов Ш.К., Рахимов Ж.К. Малоинвазивный интрамедуллярный остеосинтез в лечении переломов хирургической шейки плечевой кости у детей. //Материалы конференции «Организационные и клинические вопросы оказания помощи больным в травматологии и ортопедии». 2018; 129-131.
  4. Alimov A.P., Yusupov S.Yu., Hakimov Sh.K. A modern view on the surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures (Literature review). //Ejmpr, 2020, 7(12),10-15.
  5. Boudard G., Pomares G., Milin L., et al. Locking plate fixation versus antegrade nailing of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in patients without osteoporosis. Comparative retrospective study of 63 cases. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2014; 100(8): 917–924. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.09.021.
  6. Yan G.B. “Neer Classification of proximal humeral fracture,” //Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery, vol. 2, article 267, 2011.
  7. Dai J., Chai Y., Wang C. and Wen G. “Meta-analysis comparing locking plate fixation with hemiarthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures,” //European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 305–313, 2014.
  8. Joshi R.R., Narang S., Sundararaj G.D. Fractures of the proximal humerus in children and adolescents. //J Lumbini Med Coll, 2013;1(2):71-75.
  9. Shang L.P., Zhou F., Q H. Ji, and Zhang Z.S. “Comparison of curative effects between minimally invasive locking plate internal fixation and open reduction with internal fixation for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures,” //Journal of Peking Unviersity, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 711–716, 2013.
  10. Lekic N., Montero N.M., Takemoto R.C., et al. Treatment of two-part proximal humerus fractures: intramedullary nail compared to locked plating. //HSS J. 2012; 8(2): 86–91. doi : 10.1007/s11420-012-9274-z.
  11. Siebenbürger G., Van Delden D., Helfen T., et al. Timing of surgery for open reduction and internal fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures. //Injury. 2015; 46 (Suppl 4): S58-S62. doi: 10.1016/S00201383(15)30019-X.
  12. Song J.Q., Deng X.F., Wang Y.M., et al. Operative vs. nonoperative treatment for comminuted proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a current meta-analysis. //Acta Orthop. Traumatol. Turc. 2015; 49(4): 345–353. doi : 10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0451.
  13. Tamimi I., Montesa G., Collado F., et al. Displaced proximal humeral fractures: when is surgery necessary? //Injury. 2015; 46(10): 1921–1929. doi : 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.049.
  14. Wei Zhao et al. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis and Open Reduction Internal Fixation on Proximal Humeral Fracture in Elder Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. //Hindawi BioMed Research International. 2017; pages 7.
  15. Wronka K.S., Ved A., Mohanty K. When is it safe to reduce fracture dislocation of shoulder under sedation? Proposed treatment algorithm. //Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 2017; 27(3): 335–340. doi: 10.1007/ s00590-016-1899-z.

file

download