71 -1 (33) 2021 — Pulatova Z.A. — COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF ANTHROPOMETRIC DATA IN CHILDREN WITH DOWN’S SYNDROME

COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF ANTHROPOMETRIC DATA IN CHILDREN WITH DOWN’S SYNDROME

Pulatova Z.A. -Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali Ibn Sino

Resume

As a rule, people with Down syndrome have a specific appearance – they are characterized by the preservation of facial features characteristic of the early stage of fetal development. Here are observed: small birth weight, small stature, small limbs (disproportionate to the body), short neck, wide hands and feet, short wide fingers, a shortened little toe, the distance between the first and second toes is increased on the feet (sometimes syndactyly is observed – splicing of fingers) , the skull of a microbrachiocephalic configuration with a sloping occiput. Additional skin fold at the inner corner of the eyes (“third eyelid”, epicant), oblique eye section, there are depigmentation areas on the periphery of the iris. There is underdevelopment of the upper jaw, abnormal growth of teeth. The article analyzes the literature on the physical parameters of children with Down syndrome, but the anthropometric indicators have not been fully studied.

Key words: Down syndrome, anthropometry, epicant, microbrachiocephaly, craniofacial parameters.

First page

370

Last page

374

For citation: Pulatova Z.A. Comparative characteristics of anthropometric data in children with down’s syndrome//New Day in Medicine 1(33)2021 370-374 https://cutt.ly/tcoVYWd

LIST OF REFERENTS

1. Altynnik H.A. The ratio of the thickness of prenasal tissues to the length of the nasal bone as an echographic marker of trisomy 21 in the second trimester of pregnancy // J. Bulletin of the Medical Stomatological Institute. – 2013. -No. 1 (22). – S. 48-50.
2. Akhmedova, R.M. Assessment of the quality of life of adolescents suffering from endocrine diseases // Pediatrician. – 2016. – T. 7., No. 1. – S. 16-21.
3. Babayan V.V. Possibility of predicting the risk of having a child with Down syndrome [Text] / V.V. Babayan // Bulletin of the Russian State Medical University, Special issue №1. VI International Pirogov Scientific Medical Conference of Students and Young Scientists. – 2011. – S. 21-22.
4. Valiulina A.Ya. Problems and prospects of successful nursing and rehabilitation of children born with low and extremely low body weight // Bulletin of modern clinical medicine. – 2013. – T.6., No. 1. – S. 34-41.
5. Volianyuk E.V. Complex rehabilitation of premature babies in the first year of life // Bulletin of modern clinical medicine. – 2013. – T.6., No. 6. – P.59-62.
6. Gainetdinova D.D. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics and analysis of some risk factors for infantile cerebral palsy according to the hospital register of the Republic of Tatarstan // Kazan Medical Journal. – 2011. – T. 92., No. 6. – S. 823-827.
7. Galakhova O.O. Modern medical technologies for nursing premature babies in a multidisciplinary children’s hospital // Post-graduate bulletin of the Volga region. – 2013. – No. 5-6. – S. 84-89
8. Gnetetskaya V.A., G.G. Guzeev, I.V. Kanivets, S.A. Korostelev, H.A. Semenov. Chromosomal microarray analysis in the practice of modern genetic counseling. // Children’s Hospital. -2013, – No. 4 (54), p. 56-62.
9. Denisova E.G. Assessment of dental status in children with Down syndrome. Abstract of thesis. Ph.D., 2012 Moscow. 32 pages
10. Egorova V.B. Influence of medico-social factors and perinatal pathology on health, development and quality of life of young children // Yakutsk Medical Journal. – 2017. – No. 1 (57). – S. 10-12.
11. Medvedev M.V., Strupeneva U.A., Altynnik N.A. Echographic nomograms of prenasal tissue thickness in fetuses at 16-26 weeks of gestation // J. Bulletin of the Medical Stomatological Institute. -2012.-No.4 (21) .- P. 64-66.
12. Plotko I.S., Shevchenko E.A., Ba-digova E.A. Improvement of prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome in the II trimester of pregnancy // J. Prenatal Diagnostics. – 2013. – T. 12.-№ 1.- S. 83-87.
13. Semenova N.A. The health status of children with Down syndrome. Abstract of thesis. Ph.D. 2014. Moscow. 43 pp
14. Startsev A.A. Quality of life as a criterion for the effectiveness of rehabilitation of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder // Perm Medical Journal. – 2015. – T. 32., No. 5. – S. 120-125.
15. Strupeneva U.A., Medvedev M.V. Standard values ​​of the thickness of prenasal tissues in the fetus in the II trimester of pregnancy // J. Prenatal diagnostics. Abstracts of the XII Congress of the Russian Association in Perinatology and Gynecology. Nebug, October 17-22. – 2012. – T. 11. – No. 3. -S. 282.
16. Fedorova L.A. Features of psychomotor development and methods of rehabilitation of premature babies after discharge // Bulletin of modern clinical medicine. – 2014. – T. 7. No. 6. – S. 62-64.
17. Khetagurova Yu.Yu. Quality of life of premature infants who have undergone cerebral ischemia // Bulletin of the Volgograd State Medical University. – 2010. – No. 2. – S. 61-63.
18. Chubarova A.I., Semenov H.A. What do the numbers say? Physical development of children of the first year of life with Down syndrome. / / Down syndrome. XXI Century. -2012.-No.2 (9), p. 12-21.
19. Downside Up [Electronic resource] – Access to the magazine: http://downsideup.org.
20. Semenova N.A. The state of health of children with Down syndrome / N. A. Semenova. –Moscow, 2013. – 17 p.

71