117 -10 (60) 2023 — Islomov N.K., Mustafaqulov I.B. — COMPARISON OF COST EFFICIENCY OF TISSUE EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY

COMPARISON OF COST EFFICIENCY OF TISSUE EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY

Islomov N.K., Samarkand State Medical University

Mustafaqulov I.B., Samarkand State Medical University

Sattorov A.A., Samarkand State Medical University

Julbekov K.I., Samarkand branch of the Republican Emergency Medical Research Center

Shomurodov X.A. Samarkand branch of the Republican Emergency Medical Research Center

Resume

Comparison of cost efficiency of different tissue extraction techniques in laparoscopic surgery. 230 patients were included in retrospective study. They were operated laparoscopically in Samarkand branch of Republican Research Centre of Emergency Medicine. Our experience shows that using of self made endobags in not difficult even for beginners in laparoscopic surgery.  Prices for commercially prepared evacuation systems ranged from 42$ to 274$. Using of selfmade evacuation systems reduces the overal cost of operations.  Using of selfmade evacuation systems from sterile gloves and stitches is economically effective. This selfmade system is easy in use and construct.

Key words: endobag, laparoscopic tissue extraction, laparoscopic evacuation systems, selfmade evacuation systems.

First page

685

Last page

690

For citation: Islomov N.K., Mustafaqulov I.B., Sattorov A.A., Julbekov K.I., Shomurodov X.A. – COMPARISON OF COST EFFICIENCY OF TISSUE EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY //New Day in Medicine 2023 10(60): 685-690 https://newdaymedicine.com/index.php/2023/12/26/l-676/

LIST OF REFERENCES:

1. Теодор Н. Паппас, Аврора Д. Приор, Михаэль С. Харниш. Лапароскопическая хирургия Атлас (2021).
2. Фёдоров И.В. Осложнения эндоскопической хирургии. / Клиническое руководство. Казань 2017 г.
3. Фёдоров И.В., Малков И.С., Дубровин В.Н. Лапароскопическая хирургия, гинекология и урология. / Клиническое руководство. Казань 2016 г.
4. U.B.Berkinov Endoskopik jarroxlik. O’quv qo’llanma. Toshkent 2020.
5. Panzera, F., Ghisio, S., Grosso, A., Vigezzi, P., Vitale, M., Cariaggi, R. M., & Mistrangelo, M. (2000). Appendicectomia laparoscopica. Analisi retrospettiva della nostra esperienza in rapporto alla letteratura [Laparoscopic appendectomy. Retrospective analysis of our experience compared with the literature]. Minerva chirurgica, 2000;55(9):577-580.
6. Huang, Y., Yi, T., He, H., Li, Q., Long, X., Hu, G., Chen, Q., Li, Y., Chen, R., & Yi, X. (2021). Laparoscopic specimen extraction in vitro: preliminary experience. // BMC surgery, 2021;21(1):305. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01300-5
7. Kulkarni, A. A., Sharma, G., Deo, K. B., & Jain, T. (2022). Umbilical port versus epigastric port for gallbladder extraction in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis. // The surgeon: journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland, 2021;20(3):26-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2021.02.009
8. Mendoza-Sagaon, M., Hamitaga, F., Hurni, Y., Voumard, N. (2016). Appendix extraction after laparoscopic appendectomy in children: An easy, safe, and inexpensive technique. // Journal of pediatric surgery, 2016;51(2):341-343.
9. Begum, S., Khan, M. R., & Gill, R. C. (2019). Cost effectiveness of Glove Endobag in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Review of the available literature. JPMA. // The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 2019;69(1/1):58-61.