32 -1 (63) 2024 — Asadov D.A. — TO IDENTIFY THE STRUCTURES OF INDICATIONS FOR CESAREAN SECTION OPERATION IN PERINATAL CENTERS

TO IDENTIFY THE STRUCTURES OF INDICATIONS FOR CESAREAN SECTION OPERATION IN PERINATAL CENTERS

Asadov D.A.  Republican Perinatal Center, Uzbekistan, Tashkent

Resume

The article presents the modern structure of indications for cesarean section, which was determined on the basis of a retrospective analysis of birth histories that ended in cesarean section according to maternity hospital data. Using a questionnaire, the following were studied: age, anthropometric data, obstetric gynecological history and somatic diseases of the patients, as well as the course of pregnancy in the examined women. The timing of delivery and indications for surgical delivery were assessed, and the course of the early neonatal period was analyzed.

Key words: caesarean section, maternal mortality.

First page

168

Last page

173

For citation: Asadov D.A. – TO IDENTIFY THE STRUCTURES OF INDICATIONS FOR CESAREAN SECTION OPERATION IN PERINATAL CENTERS //New Day in Medicine 2024 1(63): 168-173 https://newdaymedicine.com/index.php/2024/01/18/l-760/

LIST OF REFERENCES:

1. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery. // Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133(2):e110–27. doi: 10.1097/ AOG.0000000000003078.
2. Bartolo S., Goffi net F., Blondel B., et al. Why women with previous caesarean and eligible for a trial of labour have an elective repeat caesarean delivery? A national study in France. // BJOG. 2016; 123:1664–73.
3. Berhan Y, Haileamlak A. The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies.
4. Boatin AA, Schlotheuber A., Betran AP., et al. Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle-income countries. // BMJ. 2018; 360:k55.
5. Budhwa T. et al. Application of the Robson classification of cesarean sections in focus: Robson groups // A report by the child health network for the greater Toronto area. Toronto, 2010; 60р.
6. Goonewardene Malik, Kumara DMA, Jathun Arachchi DR, Vithanage R, Wijeweera R. The Rising Trend in Caesarean SectionRates: Shouldweandcanwereduceit? // Sri Lanka J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 34:11-8.
7. Clark E.A. S., Silver R.M. Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011; 205(6):2-10.
8. Souza JP, Gulmezoglu A, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Carroli G, Fawole B, et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse shortterm maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. // BMC medicine. 2010; 8:71.
9. Trueba G. et al. Alternative strategy to decrease cesarean section: support by doulas during labor // J. Perinatal Education. 2000; 9(2):89-13.
10. José , Eliette Valladares, Daniel Wojdyla, Nelly Zavaleta, Guillermo Carroli, Alejandro Velazco, et.al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. // Lancet,. 2006 Jun 3; 367(9525):1819-29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68704-7.
11. Краснопольский В. И., Логутова Л. С., Петрухин В. А. Место абдоминального и влагалищного оперативного родоразрешения в современном акушерстве. Реальность и перспективы [Текст] // Акушерство и гинекология.  2012; 1:87-91.
12. Орлова В. С., Калашников И. В., Булгакова Е. В. Современная практика операции кесарева сечения за рубежом // Научные ведомости Белгородского государственного университета. Серия: Медицина, Фармация. 2013; 23/18(161):17-24.