73 -2 (34) 2021 — Akramov V.R., Asilova S.U., — INDICATORS OF ULTRASOUND DENSITOMETRIC STUDIES IN DEGENERATIVE DESTRUCTIVE DISEASES OF THE HIP JOINT

INDICATORS OF ULTRASOUND DENSITOMETRIC STUDIES IN DEGENERATIVE DESTRUCTIVE DISEASES OF THE HIP JOINT

Akramov V.R., Bukhara State Medical Institute, Tashkent Medical Academy.

Asilova S.U., Bukhara State Medical Institute, Tashkent Medical Academy.

Akhmedov Sh.Sh., Bukhara State Medical Institute, Tashkent Medical Academy.

 Khamroev B.U. Bukhara State Medical Institute, Tashkent Medical Academy.

Resume

The studies were carried out in 49 patients with degenerative – destructive diseases of the hip joint. Of these women – 21 and men – 28. Of these, there were 25 patients in the main group, in the control group of 24 patients. In the study of patients with degenerative – destructive diseases of the hip joint, bilateral coxarthrosis with aseptic of the fever bone and adductive contracture stage III, sclerosis, deformity of the femoral head with the presence of subchondral cysts is observed. There was a decrease in the BMD of the limb on the affected side (T-score and Z-score on average = -2.0) in 64.5% of cases. And at stage IV with partial or complete fibrosis of the joint, which was more often observed at the age of 55-66 years (T-score and Z-score on average = -1.6) in 78% of cases.

Key words: Ultrasound densitometric studies, degenerative-dystrophic diseases of the hip joint, BMD, T-criteria, ultrasound (SOS).

First page

377

Last page

381

For citation: Akramov V.R., Asilova S.U., Akhmedov Sh.Sh., Khamroev B.U. Indicators of ultrasound densitometric studies in degenerative destructive diseases of the hip joint //New Day in Medicine 2(34)2021 377-381 https://cutt.ly/lnXgiLx

List of References

1. Еськин Н.А. Ультразвуковая диагностика повреждений и заболеваний мягких тканей опорно-двигательного аппарата. /Методические рекомендации. М.: 1991.
2. Коваль Г.Ю., Нестеровская В.И., Перельман Б.Н. Рентгенологические изменения опорно-двигательного аппарата при гемофилии. //Клинич. рентгенология. -1975. -N.6.
3. Лабазин А. Л. Рентгеноанатомическая оценка тазобедренного сустава у взрослых в норме и при дегенеративно-дистрофических процессах: /Дис. к.м.н. Нижегородская государственная медицинская академия. 2001.
4. Вовченко А.Я., Куценок Я.Б., Зинченко В.В. Наш опыт ультразвуковой диагностики дисплазии тазобедренного сустава //Вестник ортопедии, травматологии и протезирования. 2004.
5. Crema M.D., Watts G.J., Guermazi A., Kim Y.J., Kijowski R., Roemer F.W. A narrative overview of the current status of MRI of the hip and its relevance for osteoarthritis research – what we know, what has changed and where are we going?. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017.
6. Jadhav S.P., More S.R., Shenava V., Zhang W., Kan JстH. Utility of immediate postoperative hip MRI in developmental hip dysplasia: closed vs. open reduction. Pediatr Radiol. 2018.
7. Hefti F. Spherical assessment of the hip on standard AP radiographs: a simple method for the measurement of the contact area between acetabulum and femoral head and of acetabular orientation. J Pediatr Orthop. Nov-Dec; 7(4): 856.
8. Huo M.H. et. all. Mettallic debris in femoral end osteolysis in failed cemented total Ыр arthroplasties / M.H.Huo, E.A.Salvati, J.R Lieberman et all.// Clin. Orthop. – 2013. -№ 342. -P. 243.