75 -2 (30/2) 2020 — Agzakhodjaev T.S., Rasulova X.A., — DIAGNOSTIC ADVANTAGES OF CONTACTLESS BIOIMPEDANESOMETRY

DIAGNOSTIC ADVANTAGES OF CONTACTLESS BIOIMPEDANESOMETRY

Agzakhodjaev T.S. -Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute. 223, Bagishamal street, Tashkent, 100140. http://tashpmi.uz.

Rasulova X.A. -Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute. 223, Bagishamal street, Tashkent, 100140. http://tashpmi.uz.

Shorakhmedov Sh.Sh. -Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute. 223, Bagishamal street, Tashkent, 100140. http://tashpmi.uz.

Ortiqboyev J.O. -Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute. 223, Bagishamal street, Tashkent, 100140. http://tashpmi.uz.

Resume,

The review presents an analysis of modern literature regarding the capabilities of the bioimpedansometry method in assessing the composition of the human body. It has been shown that measurement with the help of cutaneous electrodes of electrical impedance allows obtaining information without introducing changes or risk of complications into the body. Bioimpedance measurements make it possible to assess a wide range of morphological and physiological parameters. They are based on the presence of regularities connecting the impedance values with the parameters of the component composition of the body and allow us to study the dynamics and redistribution of fluid between its regions as a result of physical and physiological loads in the case of pathologies. Analysis of body composition by impedance indicators helps to monitor the state of the lipid, protein and water metabolism of the body. The role of bioimpedancemetry as a method underlying the preventive-predictive medicine, which indicates the need for additional laboratory and functional studies in order to determine further tactics of treatment and management of patients, is emphasized.

Key words: bioimpedance analysis, polarization coefficient, segment analysis, morphological and functional changes in tissues

First page

288

Last page

295

For citation: Agzakhodjaev T.S., Rasulova X.A., Shorakhmedov Sh.Sh., Ortiqboyev J.O., Diagnostic advantages of contactless bioimpedanesometry//New Day in Medicine 2(30)2020 288-295 https://cutt.ly/RvsigZS

List of References

  1. Bulatov R.L.- Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, 2012, no. 3, pp. 59-62.
  2. Viter V.I., Kovaleva M.S, Halikov A.A.- Expertise problems in medicine, 2006, no. 4, pp. 13-1
  3. Viter V.I., Onyanov A.M. Morphological statements. International Journal of Morphology, Moscow-Berlin, 2008, no. 1, pp. 162-165.
  4. Gilevich A.V. Elektroimpedansometry to assess the adequacy of general anesthesia: Abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of medical sciences, Novosibirsk, 2000, 18 p.
  5. Kovaleva M.S., Khalikov A.A., Vavilin A.Yu.- Expertise problems in medicine, 2006, no. 3, pp. 15-19
  6. Koldysheva E.V.- Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2008, no. 6, pp. 131-138.
  7. Lushnikova E.L., Nepomnyashchikh L.M., Koldysheva E.V., Molodykh O.P. Nadpochechniki. Adrenal glands. Ultrastructural reorganization under extreme impacts and during ageing, Moscow, 2009, 336 p
  8. Martirosov E.G., Nikolaev D.V., Rudnev S.G.- The technologies and methods for determining the composition of the human body, Moscow, 2006, 248.
  9. Daugirdas D.T., ed. Handbook of Dia- lysis. [In Russian: Denisov A.Yu., Shilo V.Yu, eds. Moscow, 2003. 172 p.
  10. Chang T.I., Friedman G.D., Cheung A.K., et al. Systolic blood pressure and mortality in prevalent hemodialysis patients in the HEMO study. J Hum 2011; 25(2):98-105. PMID:20410919 DOI:10.1038/jhh.2010.4
  11. Flythe J.E., Xue H., Lynch K.E., et al. Association of mortality risk with various definitions of intradialytic hypotension. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(3):724-34. DOI:10.1681/ASN.2014020222.
  12. McIntyre C.W., Odudu A. Hemodialy- sis-associated cardiomyopathy: a newly defined disease entity. Semin Dial. 2014;27(2):87-97. PMID: 24738144 5. Burton J.O., Jefferies H.J., Selby N.M., McIntyre C.W. Hemodialysis-induced cardiac injury: determinants and associ- ated outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(5):914-920. PMID:19357245 DOI:10.2215/CJN.03900808
  13. Chang T.I., Paik J., Greene T., Desai M., et al. Intradialytic hypotension and vascu- lar access thrombosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(8):1526-1533. PMID:21803971 DOI:10.1681/ ASN.2010101119
  14. Drachev I.Yu., Dzhulay G.S., Shilo V.Yu. Survival of patients depending on the values of predialysis pulse pres- sure and its variations during the hemodialysis procedure in a 5-year cohort study. “Postgraduate doctor” journal. 2018;86(1):26-36. (In Russian).
  15. 8. Machek P., Jirka T., Moissl U., et al. Guided optimization of fluid sta- tus in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(2):538-544. PMID:19793930 DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfp487
  16. Yu A.W., Nawab Z.M., Barnes W.E., et al. Splanchnic erythrocyte content decreases during hemodialysis: a new compensatory mechanism for hypovolemia. Kidney Int. 1997;51(6):1986-1990. PMID:9186892
  17. Movilli E., Gaggia P., Zubani R., et al. Association between high ultrafiltration rates and mortality in uraemic patients on regular haemodialysis. A 5-year prospective observational multi- center study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22(2):3547-3552. PMID:17890254 DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfm466
  18. Tronina O.A. Ettinger O.A. Gendlin G.E., et. Comparison of hemodynamic and elastic properties of blood vessels in patients on programmed hemodialysis (PHD) and after kidney allotransplantation (KAT).
  19. Assimon M.M., Wenger J.B., Wang L., Flythe J.E. Ultrafiltration Rate and Mortality in Maintenance Hemo- dialysis Patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68(6):911-922. PMID:27575009 DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.06.020
  20. Shilo V.Yu., Drachev I.Yu. The effect of pre- and post-dialysis blood pressure and its variations during the hemodialy- sis procedure on the survival of patients

file

download