21 -6 (68) 2024 - Niyazmetov Sevarbek Bakhtiyorovich - COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A NEW METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF AERO-AND HEMOSTASIS IN LUNG SURGERY

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A NEW METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF AERO-AND HEMOSTASIS IN LUNG SURGERY

Niyazmetov Sevarbek Bakhtiyorovich - Medical Association of Urgench District Uzbekistan

Resume

For clinical surgery, a method has been improved to prevent the development of aero- and hemostasis disorders, which involves two-component strengthening of the area of resected lung tissue by local application of a hemostatic agent with the formation of a sealed film with subsequent fixation of the parietal layer of pleura to it. It has been proven in clinical practice that the proposed method for preventing the development of disorders of aero- and hemostasis through the use of a hemostatic agent ensures stable tightness of the surface of the resected lung tissue, and fixation of the parietal pleura to this area contributes to its additional strengthening. It was also determined that the proposed method can significantly reduce the risk of complications after resection operations on the lungs, including failure of aero- and hemostasis, reduce the need for repeated open or minimally invasive interventions, as well as the timing of drainage and the duration of postoperative hospital rehabilitation.

Key words: failure of aerostasis; alveolar-pleural fistulas; postoperative complications; Hemoben.

First page

120

Last page

126

For citation:Niyazmetov Sevarbek Bakhtiyorovich - COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A NEW METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF AERO-AND HEMOSTASIS IN LUNG SURGERY/New Day in Medicine 6(68)2024 120-126 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/article/3758

List of References

1. Bronstein ME, Koo DC, Weigel TL. Management of air leaks post-surgical lung resection. //Ann Transl Med. 2019 Aug; 7(15):361. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.04.30. PMID: 31516907; PMCID: PMC6712254.
2. Chopra A, Hu K, Judson MA, Fabian T, Nabagiez JP, Feustel PJ, Fantauzzi J, Chieng H, Austin A, Vancavage R, Maldonado F, Rahman N, Huggins JT, Doelken P. Association between Drainage-Dependent Prolonged Air Leak after Partial Lung Resection and Clinical Outcomes: A Prospective Cohort Study. //Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Mar;19(3):389-398. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202103-235OC. PMID: 34715010.
3. Dugan KC, Laxmanan B, Murgu S, et al. Management of persistent air leaks. //Chest 2017;152:417-23. 10.1016/j.chest.2017.02.020.
4. Gonzalez M, Karenovics W, Bédat B, Forster C, Sauvain MO, Triponez F, Christodoulou M, Krueger T, Perentes JY. Performance of prolonged air leak scoring systems in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery segmentectomy. //Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Aug 3;62(3):ezac100. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac100. PMID: 35229873.
5. Iyama S, Sato T, Murase K, et al. Successful treatment of fibrin glue sealant for pneumothorax with chronic GVHD resistant to autologous blood patch pleurodesis. //Intern Med 2012;51:2011-4. 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.7355
6. Li J, Xue Q, Gao Y, Mao Y, Zhao J, Gao S. Bleeding is the most common cause of unplanned return to operating room after lung cancer surgeries. //J Thorac Dis. 2020 Dec;12(12):7266-7271. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2651. PMID: 33447415; PMCID: PMC7797821.
7. Mueller MR, Marzluf BA. The anticipation and management of air leaks and residual spaces post lung resection. //J Thorac Dis 2014;6:271-84.
8. Sridhar P, Litle VR, Okada M, Suzuki K. Prevention of Postoperative Prolonged Air Leak After Pulmonary Resection. //Thorac Surg Clin. 2020 Aug;30(3):305-314. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 May 22. PMID: 32593363.
9. Wu X, Xu S, Ke L, Fan J, Wang J, Xie M, Jiang X, Xu M. [Establishment of A Clinical Prediction Model of Prolonged Air Leak after Anatomic Lung Resection]. //Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 20;20(12):827-832. Chinese. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2017.12.06. PMID: 29277181; PMCID: PMC5973385.

   file

   download