63 -8 (70) 2024 - Kurbaniyazova V.E., Kurbaniyazova F.Z. - CRITERIA FOR OPTIMIZING THE EVALUATION OF THE CONSISTENCY OF A POSTOPERATIVE UTERINE SCAR IN WOMEN WHO HAVE UNDERGONE A CAESAREAN SECTION

CRITERIA FOR OPTIMIZING THE EVALUATION OF THE CONSISTENCY OF A POSTOPERATIVE UTERINE SCAR IN WOMEN WHO HAVE UNDERGONE A CAESAREAN SECTION

Kurbaniyazova V.E. - Samarkand State Medical University Uzbekistan

Kurbaniyazova F.Z. - Samarkand State Medical University Uzbekistan

Resume

This research focuses on evaluating modern diagnostic methods for assessing the consistency of uterine scars in women who have undergone a Caesarean section. The study examines the degree of scar healing and the effectiveness of various diagnostic tools. The findings facilitate early detection and the selection of appropriate treatment strategies. Based on clinical data, objective examination, ultrasound, Doppler ultrasound, and the amount of type XXVI collagen, the state of the postoperative scar was assessed as competent in 45.5% of pregnant women in the main group and as incompetent in 54.4%. The morphological analysis data confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed criteria for assessing the competence of the postoperative scar.

Keywords: Caesarean section, scar consistency, type XXVI collagen

First page

351

Last page

354

For citation:Kurbaniyazova V.E., Kurbaniyazova F.Z. - CRITERIA FOR OPTIMIZING THE EVALUATION OF THE CONSISTENCY OF A POSTOPERATIVE UTERINE SCAR IN WOMEN WHO HAVE UNDERGONE A CAESAREAN SECTION//New Day in Medicine 8(70)2024 351-354 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/8-70-2024

List of References

1. Maheux-Lacroix S, Li F, Bujold E, Nesbitt-Hawes E, Deans R, Abbott J. "Cesarean Scar Pregnancies: A Systematic Review of Treatment Options." //J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Sep-Oct;24(6):915-925. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.05.019.
2. Glenn TL, Bembry J, Findley AD, Yaklic JL, Bhagavath B, Gagneux P, Lindheim SR. "Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: Current Management Strategies." //Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2018 May;73(5):293-302. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000561.
3. Pecorino B, Scibilia G, Mignosa B, Teodoro MC, Chiofalo B, Scollo P. "Dilatation and Curettage after Uterine Artery Embolization versus Methotrexate Injection for the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Single-Center Experience." //Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Mar 15;60(3):487. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030487.
4. Gao F, Lu Y, Guo X, Gao J, Wang W, Cheng J, Fu L. "Complex Blood Supply Patterns in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Insights from Digital Subtraction Angiography Imaging." //Med Sci Monit. 2023 Sep 1;29:e940133. doi: 10.12659/MSM.940133.
5. Fu P, Zhou T, Cui P, Wang W, Wang S, Liu R. "Selection of Laparoscopy or Laparotomy for Treating Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study." //Int J Gen Med. 2022 Sep 13;15:7229-7240.
6. van der Voet LF, Bij de Vaate AM, Veersema S, Brolmann HA, Huirne JA. "Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar." //Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A6679.
7. Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ. "Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position." //Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;34(6):85-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.7456.
8. Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ory F, de Vries JI, Bloemenkamp KW, van Roosmalen J. "Uterine rupture in The Netherlands: a nationwide population-based cohort study." //BJOG. 2009 Dec;116(8):1069-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02136.x.
9. Betrán AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM. "WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates." //BJOG. 2016 Mar;123(5):667-70. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13526.
10. Florio P, Filippeschi M, Moncini I, Marra E, Franchini M, Gubbini G, Pilu G. "Hysteroscopic treatment of the cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring infertility." //Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;24(3):180-6. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283521c8e.

    file

    download