13 -2 (76) 2025 - Isaeva S.Ch., Agababyan L.R. - INNOVATIVE POSSIBILITIES OF LAPAROSCOPY IN GYNECOLOGIC OPERATIONS

INNOVATIVE POSSIBILITIES OF LAPAROSCOPY IN GYNECOLOGIC OPERATIONS

Isaeva S.Ch. - Samarkand State Medical University

Agababyan L.R. - Samarkand State Medical University

Resume

More and more surgeries will be replaced by endoscopic surgeries, which will allow patients to receive high-quality care, but without unnecessary consequences such as postoperative pain, long recovery, and large scars. The modern stage of development of surgical gynecology is characterized by increased requirements not only to the quality of equipment and technical equipment of the operating room. In addition, optical magnification allows more thoroughly stop bleeding, less traumatizing the surrounding tissue. Due to this, laparoscopic access is actively implemented in almost all areas of medicine, and in the performance of some operations acquires the status of “gold standard”.

Key words: Surgery, gynecology, laparoscopy, uterine myoma, cyst, optics

First page

71

Last page

75

For citation:Isaeva S.Ch., Agababyan L.R. - INNOVATIVE POSSIBILITIES OF LAPAROSCOPY IN GYNECOLOGIC OPERATIONS//New Day in Medicine 2(76)2025 71-75 https://https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/2-75-2025

List of References

  1. Adelman MR. The morcellation debate: the history and the science. //Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015;58(4):710-7. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000150
  2. Badeghiesh A, Suarthana E, et al. Risk of uterine rupture after myomectomy by laparoscopy or laparotomy. //J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020;49(8):101843. DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101843
  3. Allen E. Vaginal removal of the uterus by morcellation. //Am J Obstet Gynecol 1949;57:692.
  4. Fanning J. Laparoscopic conversion rate for uterine cancer surgical staging. / J. Fanning, C. Hossler //Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):1354-1357.
  5. Feasibility and clinical effects of laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: an observational study. / M. Riiskjaer, O.B. Petersen, N. Uldbjerg [et al.] //Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(11).
  6. Frick A.C. Laparoscopic management of incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. / A.C. Frick, M.F. Paraiso //Clin. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52(3):390-400.
  7. Godinjak Z. Laparoscopy after previous laparotomy. / Z. Godinjak, E. Idrizbegović, K. Begić //Bosn J. Basic Med Sci. 2006;6(4):45-47.
  8. Ikechebelu J.I. Experience with diagnostic laparoscopy for gynecological indications. / J.I. Ikechebelu //Niger J. Clin Pract. 2013;16(2):155-158.
  9. Kaloo P.D. A prospective multi-centre study of major complications experienced during excisional laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. / P.D. Kaloo, M.J. Cooper, G. Reid //Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2006;124(1):98-100.
  10. Daraï E. et al. Laparoscopic versus laparotomic radical en bloc hysterectomy and colorectal resection for endometriosis. / E. Daraï, M. Ballester, E. Chereau [et al.] //Surg Endosc. 2010;24(12):3060-3067.
  11. Panel P. et al. Laparoscopic surgery of deep endometriosis. About 118 cases. / P. Panel, C. Chis, S. Gaudin [et al.] //Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. 2006;34(7-8):583-592.
  12. Oehler M.K. Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. / M.K. Oehler //Aust N.Z. J. Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49(2):124-129.
  13. Raffi F. National survey of the current management of endometriomas in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment. / F. Raffi, R.W. Shaw, S.A. Amer //Hum Reprod. 2012;27(9):2712-2719.
  14. Pritts E.A. Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence / E.A. Pritts, W.H. Parker, D.L. Olive //Fertil Steril. 2009; 1215-1223 pp.
  15. Ulker K. Comparison of Tubal Sterilization Procedures Performed by Keyless Abdominal Rope-Lifting Surgery and Conventional CO2 Laparoscopy: A Case Controlled Clinical Study / K. Ulker, U. Hüseyinoğlu //Scientific World Journal. 2013;24:36.

    file

    download