• Home
  • NEW DAY MEDICINE
  • 3 (77) 2025
  • 122 -3 (77) 2025 - Alimov M.M., Mamasaliev N.S. - HYPOSPADIAS IN CHILDREN IS NOT ONLY A COMPLEX PROBLEM BUT ALSO NOT FINALLY SOLVED

122 -3 (77) 2025 - Alimov M.M., Mamasaliev N.S. - HYPOSPADIAS IN CHILDREN IS NOT ONLY A COMPLEX PROBLEM BUT ALSO NOT FINALLY SOLVED

HYPOSPADIAS IN CHILDREN IS NOT ONLY A COMPLEX PROBLEM BUT ALSO NOT FINALLY SOLVED

Alimov M.M. - Andijan State Medical Institute

Mamasaliev N.S. - Andijan State Medical Institute

Mamasaliev Z.N. - Andijan State Medical Institute

Usmonov B.U. - Andijan State Medical Institute

Resume

An analysis of available approaches to the management of patients with hypospadias was carried out, as well as some controversial issues regarding diagnosis in this category of patients. As available data show, surgical treatment of hypospadias has not yet led to the restoration of aesthetic and functional components, as a result of which the optimization of surgical treatment in modern conditions continues to remain relevant the task of pediatric reconstructive plastic surgery. Attention is paid to such areas as standardization of approaches to surgical treatment of hypospadias, unification of methods of urethroplasty and correction of penile curvature. Data from clinical studies on the use of various surgical techniques are presented.

Key words: hypospadias, urethroplasty, penile malformation, pediatric urology, genital reconstruction

First page

698

Last page

702

For citation:Alimov M.M., Mamasaliev N.S., Mamasaliev Z.N., Usmonov B.U. - HYPOSPADIAS IN CHILDREN IS NOT ONLY A COMPLEX PROBLEM BUT ALSO NOT FINALLY SOLVED //New Day in Medicine 3(77)2025 698-702 https://https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/3-77-2025

List of References

  1. Гарманова Т.Н. Итальянские каникулы детских урологов // Дайдонет Урологии. Специальный выпуск. 2013;3:16-23.
  2. Текчюл С. Минимально инвазивное хирургическое лечение МКБ у детей // Дейджет Урологии. Специальный выпуск. 2013;3:24-25.
  3. Текчюл С. Главное в детской урологии – создание и внедрение образовательных программ // Дайджет Урологии. Специальный выпуск. 2013;3:7-14.
  4. Шадеркина В.А. Детская урология – стремимся к совершенству ! II Всероссийская школа по детской урологии – андрологии // Дайужест Урологии. Специальный выпуск. 2013;3:3-6.
  5. Шмаков А.Н. Анестезия и плод // Учебное пособие. – Новосибирск. – 2013.
  6. Яцык С.П., Шамов Б.К., Шарков С.М., Буркин А.Г. Консервативное лечение пузырнозависимых форм мегауретера у детей // Дейджет Урологии. Специальный выпуск. 2013;3:35.
  7. Akguz F.M. Tubularized incised urethroplasty for the treatment of penile fistulas after hypospadias repair // J. Pediatr. Urol. 2014; 456-457.
  8. Bush N.C. DaJusta D, Snodgrass WT. Glans penis width in patients with hypospadias Compared to healthy controls. J Pediatr Urol 2013;9:1188-91.
  9. Bush N., Holzer M., Zhang S., Snod – grass W. Age does not impact risk for urethroplasty complications after tabularized incised plate repair of hypospadias in prepubertal bous // J. Pediatr. Urol. 2013;9:255-257.
  10. Castellan M. Gosalbez R. Devendra J. et al. Ventral corporal body grafting for correcting severe penile curvature associated with single or two – stage hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol 2011;7:289-93.
  11. Castagnetti M., El – Choneimi A. surgical management of primary severe hypospadias in children: systematic 20 – year review // J. Urol. 2010;184:1470-1474.
  12. Esposito, C., et al. Effect of metabolic syndrome and its components on prostate cancer risk: metaannalysis. J Endocrinol Invest. 2013;36:132.
  13. Esposito C., Savanelli A., Escolino M., Giurin I. et al. Preputioplasty associated with urethroplasty for correction of distal hypspadias: A prospective study and proposition of a new objective scoring system for evaluation of esthetic and functional outcome // J. Pediatr. Urol. – 2014;10:295-297.
  14. Leslie B, Lorenzo AJ, Figueroa V, et al. Critical outcome analysis of staged buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for prior failed hypospadias repaint in children. J Urol 2011;185:1077-82.
  15. Radmayr C., Bogaert G., Dogan R., Kocvara R. et al. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Barcelona 2019. ISBN 978 – 94 – 92671 – 04 – 2.
  16. Rigomonti W, Castagnetti M. On lay on albuginea: modified on lay preputial island flap urethroplasty for single – stage repair of primary severe hypospadias requiring urethral plate division. // Urology 2011;77:1498-502.
  17. Shawn Dason, Nathan Wong, Luis H. Braga The contemporary role of 1 us. 2 – stage repair fo proximal hypospadias // Trend Androl. 2014;3(4):347-358.
  18. Shodgrass W., Macedo A., Hoebeke P., Mouriguand P.D.E. Hypospadias dilemmas: A round table // J. Pediatr. Urol. 2011; 7-8.
  19. Snodgrass W. Bush N. Tubularized incised plate proximal hypospadias repair: Continued evolution and extended applications. J Pediatr Urol. 2011;7:2-9.
  20. Springer A. Kroisw, Horcher E. Trends in hypospadias surgery: results of a worldwide survey. Eur Urol 2011;60:1184-9.

    file

    download