147 -5 (79) 2025 - Sanoev B.A. - LITERATURE DATA ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF PATHOMORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES OCCURRING DURING THE CRITICAL PERIOD OF PLACENTA FORMATION IN THE 3-8TH WEEK OF PREGNANCY

LITERATURE DATA ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF PATHOMORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES OCCURRING DURING THE CRITICAL PERIOD OF PLACENTA FORMATION IN THE 3-8TH WEEK OF PREGNANCY

Sanoev B.A. - Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sina

Resume

The article draws attention to the significant advances in genetics and biology, which have made it possible to expand our understanding of the molecular basis and mechanisms of histo- and organogenesis. She emphasizes that the structural basis of interactions between mother and fetus is formed because of complex processes of cellular differentiation that determine the development of the fetus and its organs. The article points to the significant role of chronic placental insufficiency in the structure of perinatal morbidity and mortality. This article summarizes current research in the field of placental insufficiency and fetal growth restriction syndrome, highlighting its importance and implications in perinatal medicine

Key words: critical periods, perinatal complications, placental insufficiency, fetal growth restriction syndrome, chronic placental insufficiency

First page

734

Last page

740

For citation:Sanoev B.A. - LITERATURE DATA ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF PATHOMORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES OCCURRING DURING THE CRITICAL PERIOD OF PLACENTA FORMATION IN THE 3-8TH WEEK OF PREGNANCY//New Day in Medicine 5(79)2025 734-740 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/5-79-2025

List of References

1. Игнатко И. В., Байбулатова Ш.Ш., Богомазова И.М. Особенности эмбриогенеза и морфофункционального состояния поджелудочной железы плода при неосложненной беременности и задержке роста плода //Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. - М., 2016. - Том 15 №3. - C. 32-40.
2. Стрижаков А. Н., Игнатко И. В. Прогнозирование и ранняя диагностика синдрома задержки роста плода // Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. - М., 2014. - Том 13 №4. - C. 5-11.
3. Чехонацкая М. Л. и др. Эхографическая оценка физиологического развития органов половой системы плодов мужского пола при физиологическом течении беременности // Современные проблемы науки и образования. – 2018. – №. 5. – С. 23-23.
4. Burton G. J., Jauniaux E. Placentation in the human and higher primates //Placentation in Mammals: Tribute to EC Amoroso’s Lifetime Contributions to Viviparity. – 2021. – С. 223-254.
5. Chen A. et al. Analysis of the evolution of placental oxidative stress research from a bibliometric perspective //Frontiers in Pharmacology. – 2024. – Т. 15. – С. 1475244.
6. Freeman B. M. et al. Effects of external stimulation on embryonic activity, rate of development and time of hatching //Development of the Avian Embryo: A Behavioural and Physiological Study. – 1974. – С. 43-61.
7. Hutcheon J. A. et al. Placental weight for gestational age and adverse perinatal outcomes //Obstetrics & Gynecology. – 2012. – Т. 119. – №. 6. – С. 1251-1258.
8. Moffett A., Shreeve N. Local immune recognition of trophoblast in early human pregnancy: controversies and questions //Nature Reviews Immunology. – 2023. – Т. 23. – №. 4. – С. 222-235.
9. Thompson B. B., Holzer P. H., Kliman H. J. Placental pathology findings in unexplained pregnancy losses //Reproductive Sciences. – 2024. – Т. 31. – №. 2. – С. 488-504.
10. Wooding F. P., Burton G. J. Springer; Berlin: 2008 //Comparative placentation. Structures, functions and evolution. – С. 301.

    file

    download