158 -5 (79) 2025 - Ahmadova M.A. - ADVANTAGES OF STEREOTACTIC BIOPSY BY MAMMOGRAPHY IN BREAST TUMORS

ADVANTAGES OF STEREOTACTIC BIOPSY BY MAMMOGRAPHY IN BREAST TUMORS

Ahmadova M.A. - Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sina

Resume

Annotation: it is important to know the objectives of the biopsy, the pathological results and the expected changes in the frequency of the discrepancy. Compare the types of biopsy targets, pathological results, and mismatch rates 2 years before and 2 years after a controlled biopsy is performed.mammography. All nuclear biopsies were retrospectively analyzed using stereotactic digital mammography from 2021 to 2023 and a controlled 9-gauge vacuum from 2021 to 2023. All mammography was done with the help of research.. Demographic data of patients, target type for biopsy, pathological conclusions, surgical excision samples, if any, breast density and subsequent vision results were recorded. The aims of the biopsy and the degree of inconsistency between X-ray and pathological studies were compared between the two biopsy groups. Generalized mixed modeling was used to study results before and after controlled biopsy.

Keywords: digital mammography, controlled biopsy, breast tomosynthesis, tissue damage

First page

783

Last page

786

For citation:Ahmadova M.A. - ADVANTAGES OF STEREOTACTIC BIOPSY BY MAMMOGRAPHY IN BREAST TUMORS//New Day in Medicine 5(79)2025 783-786 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/5-79-2025

List of References

  1. Axmadova Maftuna Amin qizi Bukhara Medical Institute assistant department Oncology and medical radiology/Modern Analysis of the Diagnostic Effectiveness of Digital Mammography/International Interdisciplinary Research Journal.
  2. Akhmadova Maftun Amin kizi Analysis of the Modern Diagnostic Effectiveness of Mammography International Journal of Health Systems and Medical Sciences ISSN: 2833-7433 Volume 2 | No 9 | Sep -2023
  3. Tagliafico A, Houssami N, Calabrese M, eds. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Practical Approach. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International, 2016.
  4. Andersson I, Ikeda DM, Zackrisson S, et al. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol 2008;18(12):2817– 2825.
  5. Chong A, Weinstein SP, McDonald ES, Conant EF. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Concepts and Clinical Practice. Radiology 2019;292(1):1–14.
  6. Vedantham S, Karellas A, Vijayaraghavan GR, Koopmans DB. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art. Radiology 2015;277(3):663–684.

    file

    download