220 -5 (79) 2025 - A.U.Abdusamatov, D.Sh. Abdurakhmanov - METHOD OF BILE DUCT SANITATION AFTER RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY FOR TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF CHOLANGITIS

METHOD OF BILE DUCT SANITATION AFTER RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY FOR TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF CHOLANGITIS

A.U.Abdusamatov - Samarkand State Medical University

D.Sh. Abdurakhmanov - Samarkand State Medical University

Resume

Cholangitis after reconstructive surgery on the bile ducts is a serious problem of modern hepatobiliary surgery, significantly impairing the prognosis and quality of life of patients. According to modern research, the incidence of postoperative cholangitis varies from 15% to 45%, and recurrent forms are observed in 30-60% of patients after reconstructive interventions on the biliary tract. The problem is particularly relevant in patients with high strictures and damage to the bile ducts, when anatomical and functional changes in the biliary tract create conditions for the persistence of infection and the formation of antibiotic-resistant strains of microorganisms.Traditional methods of cholangitis prevention and treatment, including systemic antibacterial therapy and passive drainage of the bile ducts, often show insufficient effectiveness

Keywords: cholangitis, reconstructive surgery, bile ducts, sanitation, prevention, bile duct strictures, biliary complications, pulsation-vacuum sanitation

First page

1088

Last page

1093

For citation:A.U.Abdusamatov, D.Sh. Abdurakhmanov - METHOD OF BILE DUCT SANITATION AFTER RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY FOR TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF CHOLANGITIS//New Day in Medicine 5(79)2025 1088-1093 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/5-79-2025

List of References

1. Гальперин Э.И., Кузовлев Н.Ф., Карагюлян С.Р. Рубцовые стриктуры желчных протоков. М.: Медицина, 2019; 200 с.
2. Bismuth H., Majno P.E. Biliary strictures: classification based on the principles of surgical treatment. World Journal of Surgery. 2018; 25(10): 1241-1244.
3. Парфенов И.П., Ярош А.Л., Солошенко А.В. Осложнения реконструктивных вмешательств на желчных протоках. Анналы хирургической гепатологии. 2020; 17(3): 21-28.
4. Andriulli A., Loperfido S., Napolitano G., et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017; 112(8): 1781-1788.
5. Karimov S.I., Khakimov M.S., Borovskiy S.P. Long-term results of reconstructive interventions on the extrahepatic bile ducts. Annals of Surgical Hepatology. 2018; 23(1): p.47-54.
6. Strasberg S.M., Hertl M., Soper N.J. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2019; 180(1): 101-125.
7. World Health Organization. Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO, 2018; p. 123-145.
8. Гальперин Э.И., Ветшев П.С. Руководство по хирургии желчных путей. 2-е изд. М.: Видар-М, 2022; 312 с.
9. Stewart L., Govekar H.R., Leung J.W., et al. Biliary bacterial factors determine the path of gallstone formation. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2020; 10(7): 1020-1026.
10. Solomkin J.S., Mazuski J.E., Bradley J.S., et al. Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2020; 50(2): 133-164.
11. Lygidakis N.J., Tytgat G.N. Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Malignancies: Diagnosis, Medical and Surgical Management. 2nd ed. Thieme, 2018; 322 p.

    file

    download