300 -5 (79) 2025 - Kurbaniyazov Z.B., Davronov A.U. - DETERMINANTS OF SURGICAL APPROACH IN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCERS

DETERMINANTS OF SURGICAL APPROACH IN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCERS

Kurbaniyazov Z.B. - Samarkand State Medical University

Davronov A.U. - Samarkand State Medical University

Resume

This article analyzes the key factors influencing the choice of surgical approach in emergency management of perforated peptic ulcers. Clinical and anatomical criteria such as ulcer size, perforation site, patient condition, and severity of peritonitis are evaluated. The study demonstrates that with proper assessment, surgeons can reasonably select either a laparoscopic or open approach to optimize treatment outcomes.

Keywords. Perforated ulcer; gastroduodenal ulcer; laparoscopy; minimally invasive surgery; omental patch; peritonitis

First page

1483

Last page

1491

For citation:Kurbaniyazov Z.B., Davronov A.U. - DETERMINANTS OF SURGICAL APPROACH IN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCERS//New Day in Medicine 5(79)2025 1483-1491 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/5-79-2025

List of References

  1. Chan, W. H., Wong, W. K., Ching, J., Khin, L. W., & Soo, K. C. (2000). Adverse operative risk factors for perforated peptic ulcer. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 29(2), 164–167.
  2. Blomgren, L. G. (1997). Perforated peptic ulcer: long-term results after simple closure in the elderly. World Journal of Surgery, 21(4), 412–414.
  3. Svanes, C. (2000). Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: incidence, etiology, treatment, and prognosis. World Journal of Surgery, 24(3), 277–283.
  4. Bertleff, M. J., Lange, J. F. (2010). Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU): first choice? A review of literature. Surgical Endoscopy, 24(6), 1231–1239.
  5. Critchley, A. C., Phillips, A. W., Bawa, S. M., & Gallagher, P. V. (2011). Management of perforated peptic ulcer in a district general hospital. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 93(8), 615–619.
  6. Sartelli, M., Viale, P., Catena, F., Ansaloni, L., Moore, E. E., Malangoni, M., … & Chichom-Mefire, A. (2013). WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 8, 3.
  7. Timerbulatov, V. M., Mehdiev, D. I., Fayazov, R. R., & Co-authors. (2015a). Traditional and minimally invasive methods of suturing perforated gastric and duodenal ulcers. Almanac of the A. V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, 10(2), 31–32. [Article in Russian].
  8. Timerbulatov, V. M., Mehdiev, D. I., Timerbulatov, Sh. V., & Co-authors. (2015b). Surgical tactics in perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. Medical Bulletin of Bashkortostan, (6), 22–26. [Article in Russian].
  9. Hisamutdinova, R. I., Timerbulatov, Sh. V., & Sagitov, R. B. (2017). Video-laparoscopic operations for perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. Practical Medicine, (6), 127–130. [Article in Russian].
  10. Mitin, S. E., Peshekhonov, S. I., Chistyakov, D. V., et al. (1998). Potential of laparoscopic operations in patients with complicated gastric and duodenal ulcers. Endoscopic Surgery, 2(1), 30–32. [Article in Russian].
  11. Khasanov, A. G., Nurtdinov, M. A., Galin, M. B., et al. (2015). Immediate and long-term results of treatment of perforated ulcers in women. Ural Medical Journal, (8 issue 133), 144–147. [Article in Russian].
  12. Boey, J., Lee, N. W., Koo, J., & Lam, P. H. (1987). A prospective validation of a clinical scoring system for predicting mortality in perforated peptic ulcer. Annals of Surgery, 205(1), 22–26.
  13. Hermansson, M., Ekedahl, A., Ranstam, J., & Zilling, T. (2009). Decreasing incidence of peptic ulcer complications after the introduction of proton pump inhibitors: a population-based study. World Journal of Surgery, 33(1), 196–202.
  14. Søreide, K., Thorsen, K., Harrison, E. M., Bingener, J., Møller, M. H., Ohene-Yeboah, M., & Søreide, J. A. (2015). Perforated peptic ulcer. The Lancet, 386(10000), 1288–1298.
  15. Arveen, S., Jagdish, S., & Kadambari, D. (2009). Perforated peptic ulcer in South India: an institutional perspective. World Journal of Surgery, 33(8), 1600–1604.

    file

    download