113 -6 (80) 2025 - Khasanov A.Y., Mavlyanova Z., Djurabekova A.T. - CURRENT VIEWS ON THE DIAGNOSIS OF CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME FROM SYMPTOMS TO CONFIRMED FINDINGS

CURRENT VIEWS ON THE DIAGNOSIS OF CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME FROM SYMPTOMS TO CONFIRMED FINDINGS

Khasanov A.Y. - Samarkand State Medical University

Mavlyanova Z. - Samarkand State Medical University

Djurabekova A.T. - Samarkand State Medical University

Resume

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy, predominantly affecting middle-aged individuals and often associated with occupational overuse and systemic comorbidities. This review summarizes current data on the epidemiology, risk factors, and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying CTS. Special attention is given to diagnostic criteria, including standardized clinical tests (Phalen, Tinel, Durkan), neurological examination, electrophysiological evaluation (EMG/NCS), and imaging modalities such as ultrasound and MRI of the carpal tunnel. The review also highlights the challenges of early diagnosis, including false-negative results and limitations of individual diagnostic methods. The authors emphasize the need for a multidisciplinary approach to improve early detection and prevent irreversible nerve damage in CTS

Keywords: carpal tunnel syndrome, median nerve, clinical tests, electromyography, ultrasound, early diagnosis, entrapment neuropathy

First page

553

Last page

559

For citation:Khasanov A.Y., Mavlyanova Z., Djurabekova A.T. - CURRENT VIEWS ON THE DIAGNOSIS OF CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME FROM SYMPTOMS TO CONFIRMED FINDINGS//New Day in Medicine 6(80)2025 553-559 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/6-80-2025

List of References

1. Алиев Ш.М., Мухамедов Х.М. Диагностика и лечение синдрома запястного канала. // Вестник нейрохирургии. – 2019. – № 1. – С. 45–50.
2. Волков В.А., Лапшин Д.Н. Ультразвуковая диагностика компрессионных невропатий: современные возможности. // Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. – 2021. – Т. 121, № 7. – С. 52–58.
3. Мухаметшин Р.Р., Якубов Р.Ф., Сайфутдинов Р.Г. Комплексный подход к диагностике и лечению СЗК у пациентов трудоспособного возраста. // Практическая медицина. – 2020. – № 5(73). – С. 89–94.
4. Белкин И.М., Краснов А.М. Электродиагностика туннельных невропатий: методические рекомендации. // Неврология, нейропсихиатрия, психосоматика. – 2020. – № 3. – С. 66–71.
5. Шустерова Т.А., Шоломов И.И. Клинико-инструментальная диагностика компрессионно-ишемических невропатий. // Врач. – 2022. – № 4. – С. 29–34.
6. Bland J.D. A neurophysiological grading scale for carpal tunnel syndrome. // Muscle & Nerve. – 2000. – Vol. 23(8). – P. 1280–1283.
7. Padua L., Coraci D., Erra C. et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. // Lancet Neurology. – 2020. – Vol. 19(10). – P. 984–996.
8. Werner R.A., Andary M.T. Electrodiagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. // Muscle & Nerve. – 2021. – Vol. 63(4). – P. 501–509.
9. Jablecki C.K., Andary M.T., So Y.T. et al. Practice parameter: electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. // Neurology. – 2002. – Vol. 58(11). – P. 1589–1592.
10. Chen L., Zhang X., Zhang W. et al. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a review. // Frontiers in Neurology. – 2022. – Vol. 13. – Article 817377.

    file

    download