• Home
  • NEW DAY MEDICINE
  • 7 (81) 2025
  • 55 -7 (81) 2025 - H.M. Abdullaev, O.T. Nuritdinov - THERE ARE TWO TYPES OF INFLAMMATORY PROCESSES IN PERFORATION OF THE COLON AND COLON: CHANGES, COMPLICATIONS, AND PROGNOSIS

55 -7 (81) 2025 - H.M. Abdullaev, O.T. Nuritdinov - THERE ARE TWO TYPES OF INFLAMMATORY PROCESSES IN PERFORATION OF THE COLON AND COLON: CHANGES, COMPLICATIONS, AND PROGNOSIS

THERE ARE TWO TYPES OF INFLAMMATORY PROCESSES IN PERFORATION OF THE COLON AND COLON: CHANGES, COMPLICATIONS, AND PROGNOSIS

H.M. Abdullaev - Namangan Regional Medical Center

O.T. Nuritdinov - Andijan State Medical Institute

Sh. Kholikov - Andijan State Medical Institute

Resume

This article covers extensively the role of perforated duodenal ulcer (PPU)in modern surgery, treatments, complications, and prognosis assessment systems. Based on the available scientific sources, an in-depth analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of conservative and surgical treatment methods, including the laparoscopic "three-seam" Graham patch technique, resection and vagotomy methods was carried out. Forecasting systems such as Boey, PULP, ASA and aspects of their application in clinical practice were also considered. The article provides clinical recommendations and specific approaches to effectively conduct emergency surgery in patients with perforated wound

Keywords: perforated peptic ulcer, laparoscopic Graham patch, Boey prognosis system

First page

278

Last page

284

For citation:H.M. Abdullaev, O.T. Nuritdinov, Sh. Kholikov - THERE ARE TWO TYPES OF INFLAMMATORY PROCESSES IN PERFORATION OF THE COLON AND COLON: CHANGES, COMPLICATIONS, AND PROGNOSIS//New Day in Medicine 7(81)2025 278-284 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/7-81-2025

List of References

  1. Zittel, T.T., E.C. Jehle, and H.D. Becker, Surgical management of peptic ulcer disease today--indication, technique and outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2000. 385(2): p. 84-96.
  2. Chung, K.T. and V.G. Shelat, Perforated peptic ulcer - an update. World J Gastrointest Surg, 2017. 9(1): p. 1-12.
  3. Søreide, K., et al., Perforated peptic ulcer. Lancet, 2015. 386(10000): p. 1288-1298.
  4. Møller, M.H., et al., Perforated peptic ulcer: how to improve outcome? Scand J Gastroenterol, 2009. 44(1): p. 15-22.
  5. Millat, B., A. Fingerhut, and F. Borie, Surgical treatment of complicated duodenal ulcers: controlled trials. World J Surg, 2000. 24(3): p. 299-306.
  6. Stabile, B.E., Current surgical management of duodenal ulcers. Surg Clin North Am, 1992. 72(2): p. 335-56.
  7. Hamdi, A., et al., [Long-term outcome of surgically treated peptic ulcer. Review of a series of 419 patients operated for peptic ulcer]. Ann Chir, 1991. 45(6): p. 490-6.
  8. Fedinets, A.V., et al., [Compensatory reactions after surgical treatment of peptic ulcer]. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek, 1976. 117(11): p. 25-7.
  9. Kocer, B., et al., Factors affecting mortality and morbidity in patients with peptic ulcer perforation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2007. 22(4): p. 565-70.
  10. Boey, J., J. Wong, and G.B. Ong, A prospective study of operative risk factors in perforated duodenal ulcers. Ann Surg, 1982. 195(3): p. 265-9.

    file

    download