151 -12 (86) 2025 - Yusupov S.Y. - INTEGRATION OF PREDICTORS AND DIGITAL MODELS IN OPTIMIZING TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT

INTEGRATION OF PREDICTORS AND DIGITAL MODELS IN OPTIMIZING TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT

Yusupov S.Y. - Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sina

Resume

Degenerative and inflammatory diseases of the hip joint remain one of the leading causes of persistent disability and reduced quality of life in the elderly and working-age population. Total hip arthroplasty is an effective method of surgical restoration of joint function, but the frequency of early and late complications remains a significant clinical issue. The current paradigm of orthopedic surgery is shifting towards predictive and personalized medicine, which involves integrating clinical predictors, mathematical modeling, and digital technologies into the decision-making process.

Key words: hip arthroplasty, mathematical modeling, predictors, personalized medicine, revision, complications, prognosis.

First page

853

Last page

857

For citation:Yusupov S.Y. - INTEGRATION OF PREDICTORS AND DIGITAL MODELS IN OPTIMIZING TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT//New Day in Medicine 12(86)2025 853-857 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/12-86-2025

List of References

  1. Akramov V.R. / Optimization of methods of treatment and rehabilitation of patients with aseptic necrosis of the femoral head. // Abstract of the dissertation. for DSc. Tashkent. 2021; 65 p.
  2. Сhen H.T. et al. / Structural and Morselized allografting combined with a cementless cup for acetabular Defects in Revision Total Hip arthroplasty: a 4- to 14-year follow-up. // Biomed Res Int. 2018 feb 4; 2018:2364269. DoI: 10.1155/2018/2364269.
  3. Hao Y, Luo D, Wu J, et al. A novel revision system for complex pelvic defects utilizing 3D-printed custom prosthesis. J Orthop Translat. 2021;31:102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2021.09.006.
  4. Haynes J.A. et al. / Contemporary surgical indications and referral trends in revision total hip arthroplasty: A 100-year review // J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:622-625.
  5. Ilyin A.A. and others. / The use of mathematical modeling to predict the biomechanics of hip implants. // Bulletin of traumatology and orthopedics. N.N. Priorov 2009;16(3):7–13.
  6. Ilyin A.A. and others. / Substantiation of the design and investigation of the biomechanical behavior of the wedge-shaped leg of the cement fixation of the hip joint endoprosthesis. // Bulletin of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2005; No.3:3-10.
  7. Irismetov M.E., Fozilov Kh.T. Khakimov Sh.K., Safarov N.B. / Associated applicance of artroscopic debridement and proximal fibular osteotomy at the treatment of patients with deformic artritis of knee. // Genij Ortopedii. 2022;28(6):768-773. doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2022-28-6-768-773
  8. Klemt C. et al. Can machine learning models predict failure of revision THA? – Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143(6):2805–2812.
  9. Klemt C. et al. ML algorithms for predicting PROMs after TJA. – Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143(4):2235–2245.
  10. Lychagin AV, Rosenberg N, Gritsyuk AA. Evaluation of the potential complications of surgical wound drainage in primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective controlled double-blind study. Hip Int. 2021;31(5):589-592. doi: 10.1177/1120700020941749.

    file

    download