• Home
  • NEW DAY MEDICINE
  • 1 (87) 2026
  • 59 -1 (87) 2026 - B.S. Mamadzhanov, A.U. Norov - INTEGRATIVE VALUE OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING DATA IN CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING DURING THE PRE-TREATMENT PERIOD FOR TRAUMA-RELATED INJURY

59 -1 (87) 2026 - B.S. Mamadzhanov, A.U. Norov - INTEGRATIVE VALUE OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING DATA IN CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING DURING THE PRE-TREATMENT PERIOD FOR TRAUMA-RELATED INJURY

INTEGRATIVE VALUE OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING DATA IN CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING DURING THE PRE-TREATMENT PERIOD FOR TRAUMA-RELATED INJURY

B.S. Mamadzhanov - Andijan State Medical Institute

A.U. Norov - Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Neurosurgery of Uzbekistan

Sh. Kholikov - Andijan State Medical Institute

Resume

This study evaluates the integrative role of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in clinical decision-making during the preoperative period in patients with traumatic brain injury. A retrospective analysis was conducted using preoperative medical records and radiological findings from 40 patients who underwent surgical treatment in 2025. Radiological features were assessed in terms of lesion localization, morphological characteristics, and impact on surrounding tissues, and were classified according to absolute, relative, and dynamic observation-based indications for surgical intervention. The results demonstrate the diagnostic advantage of CT in the assessment of osseous structures and mass lesions, while MRI shows superior value in evaluating soft tissue and infiltrative changes. The combined application of CT and MRI enhances clinico-radiological concordance, supports individualized surgical strategy planning, and contributes to improved patient safety and clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Traumatic brain injury, computed tomography, clinical decision-making

First page

348

Last page

353

For citation:B.S. Mamadzhanov, A.U. Norov, Sh. Kholikov - INTEGRATIVE VALUE OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING DATA IN CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING DURING THE PRE-TREATMENT PERIOD FOR TRAUMA-RELATED INJURY//New Day in Medicine 1(87)2026 348-353 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/1-87-2026

List of References

  1. Maas A.I., Menon D.K., Adelson P.D., et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. The Lancet Neurology. 2017;16(12):987–1048.
  2. Bigler E.D. Neuroimaging biomarkers in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Neuropsychology Review. 2013;23(3):169–209.
  3. Blennow K., Brody D.L., Kochanek P.M., et al. Traumatic brain injuries. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2016;2:16084.
  4. Johnson V.E., Stewart W., Smith D.H. Axonal pathology in traumatic brain injury. Experimental Neurology. 2013;246:35–43.
  5. Lee H., Wintermark M., Gean A.D., Ghajar J. Imaging of traumatic brain injury: current concepts. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2008;23(4):191–205.
  6. Niogi S.N., Mukherjee P. Diffusion tensor imaging of mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2010;25(4):241–255.
  7. Giza C.C., Hovda D.A. The new neurometabolic cascade of concussion. Neurosurgery. 2014;75(Suppl 4):S24–S33.
  8. Рахимов З.Б. Патоморфологические особенности реактивных изменений мозговой ткани при бош-мозговой травме. Докторлик диссертацияси (DSc). Самарканд, 2019.

    file

    download