18 -4 (90) 2026 - Muminov J.A., Kurbanov O.M. - EFFECTIVENESS OF A MODIFIED SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FOR URETEROCYSTOANASTOMOSIS FORMATION IN LIVING-RELATED KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION

EFFECTIVENESS OF A MODIFIED SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FOR URETEROCYSTOANASTOMOSIS FORMATION IN LIVING-RELATED KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION

Muminov J.A. - Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sina

Kurbanov O.M. - Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sina

Resume

The study included 72 patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease who underwent living-related kidney transplantation between 2021 and 2025. Depending on the surgical technique used for ureterocystoanastomosis formation, the patients were divided into two groups: group I — standard technique (n=33), group II — modified technique (n=39). Within the groups, non-sensitized and highly sensitized recipients were identified. In the overall cohort, one case of clinically significant urodynamic complication due to compressive lymphocele was registered, which accounted for 1.39% (1/72). In the standard technique group, the complication occurred in 1 of 33 patients (3.03%), whereas in the modified technique group no complications were observed — 0% (0/39). The obtained results indicate that the modified surgical technique for ureterocystoanastomosis formation contributes to a reduction in the incidence of early urological complications and improves postoperative management following kidney transplantation.

Keywords: kidney transplantation, ureterocystoanastomosis, surgical technique, lymphocele, urological complications, living-related transplantation.

First page

125

Last page

131

For citation:Muminov J.A., Kurbanov O.M. - EFFECTIVENESS OF A MODIFIED SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FOR URETEROCYSTOANASTOMOSIS FORMATION IN LIVING-RELATED KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION//New Day in Medicine 4(90)2026 125-131 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/4-90-2026

List of References

1. Belavina NI, Utkina AI, Kovalenko ES. Диагностическое значение ультразвукового мониторинга при иммунных осложнениях трансплантации почки. Трансплантология. 2023;15(2):65–72.
2. Belavina NI, Utkina AI, Kovalenko ES. Роль ультразвукового исследования нефункционирующего почечного трансплантата. Трансплантология. 2023;15(2):65–72.
3. Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W, Mao MA, et al. Delayed graft function and acute rejection risk. Transplant Rev. 2023;37(2):100732. doi:10.1016/j.trre.2023.100732
4. Charlton M, Loupy A, Halloran PF. Delayed graft function: definition, incidence, outcomes. Transplantation. 2019;103(2):e11–e21. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000002500
5. Coemans MA, Süsal C, Döhler B, et al. Long-term kidney graft survival in Europe: a 30-year analysis. Transplantation. 2021;105(10):2204–2214. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000003504
6. Djamali A, Kaufman DB, Ellis TM, Zhong W, Matas AJ. Diagnosis and management of antibody-mediated rejection: current status and novel approaches. Am J Transplant. 2014;14(2):255–271. doi:10.1111/ajt.12589
7. Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation. WHO Report. 2023.
8. Halloran PF, Einecke G, Venner JM. The molecular phenotype of rejection in kidney transplants. Transplantation. 2020;104(6):1223–1237. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000003055
9. Halloran PF, Venner JM, Madill-Thomsen KS. Comprehensive molecular diagnosis of T-cell-mediated rejection in kidney transplant biopsies. Transplantation. 2020;104(4):715–728. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000002955
10. Ismatov TA. Effectiveness of Desensitizing Therapy in Kidney Transplantation in Highly Sensitized Patients Before Transplantation. Miasto Przyszłości. 2024;55:1231–1237.

    file

    download