• Home
  • NEW DAY MEDICINE
  • 4 (90) 2026
  • 45 -4 (90) 2026 - Sharipova R.G., Sultonova L.J. - STUDY OF THE CELLULAR COMPOSITION OF BONE MARROW AFTER EXPERIMENTAL THYMECTOMY AND DETERMINATION OF THE LEVEL OF EFFECT OF THE PROBIOTIC “LACTOPROPOLIS-AWL”

45 -4 (90) 2026 - Sharipova R.G., Sultonova L.J. - STUDY OF THE CELLULAR COMPOSITION OF BONE MARROW AFTER EXPERIMENTAL THYMECTOMY AND DETERMINATION OF THE LEVEL OF EFFECT OF THE PROBIOTIC “LACTOPROPOLIS-AWL”

STUDY OF THE CELLULAR COMPOSITION OF BONE MARROW AFTER EXPERIMENTAL THYMECTOMY AND DETERMINATION OF THE LEVEL OF EFFECT OF THE PROBIOTIC “LACTOPROPOLIS-AWL”

Sharipova R.G. - Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sina

Sultonova L.J. - Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sina

Resume

The thymus is the center of the immune system, facilitating the proliferation, differentiation and functional maturation of T-lymphocytes, which mediate the cellular immune response. Disturbances in its structure and function, especially as a result of thymectomy, can have a systemic effect on hematopoiesis and immunoregulatory mechanisms. The aim of this study was to conduct a comparative study of cytogenetic changes in bone marrow cells in white rats after thymectomy and to comprehensively evaluate the data obtained. These data confirm the important role of the thymus in maintaining the proliferative potential and genetic stability of bone marrow cells, and also indicate its participation in the regulation of systemic immune homeostasis.

Keywords: bone marrow, thymus, thymectomy, bone marrow, cytological studies, white outbred rats.

First page

327

Last page

331

For citation:Sharipova R.G., Sultonova L.J. - STUDY OF THE CELLULAR COMPOSITION OF BONE MARROW AFTER EXPERIMENTAL THYMECTOMY AND DETERMINATION OF THE LEVEL OF EFFECT OF THE PROBIOTIC “LACTOPROPOLIS-AWL”//New Day in Medicine 4(90)2026 327-331 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/4-90-2026

List of References

  1. Нуралиева У.М. Выявление причины развития дисбиоза кишечника у тимэктомированных лабораторных животных в эксперименте. Журнал гуманитарных и естественных наук. 2024;8(03):160–164.
  2. Нуралиев Н.А., Бектимиров А.М-Т., Алимова М.Т., Сувонов К.Ж. Правила и методы работы с лабораторными животными при экспериментальных микробиологических и иммунологических исследованиях. Методическое пособие. Ташкент; 2016. 34 с.
  3. Нуралиев Н.А., Хомидова С.Х. Иммунология. Ўқув қўлланма. Бухоро; 2023. 157 б.
  4. Полевщиков А.В. Новые данные по иммунофизиологии тимуса. Журнал теоретической и клинической медицины. 2018;(4):136–138.
  5. Шарипова Р.Ғ. Тажрибавий тимэктомиянинг суяк кўмигига таъсирини баҳолаш. Фундаментал ва клиник тиббиёт ахборотномаси. 2026;1(21):596–601.
  6. Шарипова Р.Ғ. Тажрибавий тимэктомиянинг суяк кўмигига таъсири даражасини аниқлашнинг хусусиятлари. Журнал гуманитарных и естественных наук. 2025;1(26):264–271.
  7. Abbas AK, Lichtman AH, Pillai S. Cellular and Molecular Immunology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2021. 608 p.
  8. Casanova J-L. Human immunity. Journal of Human Immunity. 2025;1(1):e20250001.
  9. Kraus RF, Gruber MA. Neutrophils: From bone marrow to first-line defense of the innate immune system. Front Immunol. 2021;12:767175. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.767175.
  10. Murphy K, Weaver C. Janeway’s Immunobiology. 10th ed. New York: Garland Science; 2022. 928 p.

    file

    download