50 -4 (90) 2026 - Madaminov F. - MODELING OF CLINICAL-PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN ADRENAL TUMORS IN THE ARAL REGION
MODELING OF CLINICAL-PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN ADRENAL TUMORS IN THE ARAL REGION
Madaminov F. - Khorezm Branch of the Republican Scientific Center for Emergency Medical Care Uzbekistan
Resume
To comprehensively evaluate clinical, morphological and immunohistochemical factors of adrenal tumors in the Aral Sea region and to develop an integrated prognostic model for assessing the risk of disease progression and metastasis. Materials and Methods: The study included 186 patients examined between 2016 and 2024 using both retrospective and prospective approaches. Clinical (age, sex, symptoms), morphological (tumor type, differentiation grade), immunohistochemical (Ki-67, Melan A, S-100) and functional (hormonal activity) parameters were analyzed. Statistical methods included Pearson correlation, multivariate logistic regression, and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: Ki-67 index (r=0.68; p<0.01), tumor size (r=0.54; p<0.05), and hormonal activity (r=0.49; p<0.05) were identified as the most significant prognostic factors. Patients with Ki-67 >20% demonstrated a complication rate of 58%, which was 2.1 times higher than in the low-risk group. Metastasis incidence was also 1.8 times higher. An integrated risk index (IRI) was developed, stratifying patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Disease progression in the high-risk group was observed 2.3 times more frequently. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a 5-year survival rate of 75% in the low-risk group compared to 30% in the high-risk group (p<0.01). ROC analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.82, indicating high predictive accuracy of the model. Conclusion: The integrated model combining clinical, morphological and immunohistochemical parameters provides a reliable tool for predicting disease course, assessing metastatic risk, and optimizing individualized treatment strategies.
Keywords: adrenal gland, Ki-67, prognosis, metastasis, risk model, immunohistochemistry.
First page
357
Last page
363
For citation:Madaminov F. - MODELING OF CLINICAL-PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN ADRENAL TUMORS IN THE ARAL REGION//New Day in Medicine 4(90)2026 357-363 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/4-90-2026
List of References
- Филимонюк А.В., Смирнова Е.А., Теодорадзе Р.В. Особенности диагностики опухолей надпочечника. //Вестник РУДН, серия «Медицина», 2013; 1:78-82
- Филиппова О. В. Клинико-морфологическая характеристика опухолей надпочечников (морфологическое, иммуногистохимическое, электронно-микроскопическое исследование) : дис. – ГОУВПО" Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет", 2012.
- Тимофеева Н. Ю. и др. Роль надпочечников в метастазировании опухолей (обзор литературы) //Acta Medica Eurasica. – 2022. – №. 2. – С. 50-60.
- Калинин А. П., Полякова Г. А. Морфологические и иммуногистохимические маркеры злокачественности феохромоцитомы надпочечников //Хирург. – 2011. – №. 1. – С. 62-66.
- Zhang JH, Fu YF, Wang JY. Percutaneous ablation for adrenal metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. //Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Dec;17(4):549-560.
- Zahir ST, Aalipour E, Barand P, Kaboodsaz M. Clinicopathological Features of Adrenal Tumors: a Ten-year Study in Yazd, Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(12):5031-6
- Wiedemann T, Peitzsch M, Qin N, Neff F, Ehrhart-Bornstein M, Eisenhofer G, Pellegata NS. Morphology, Biochemistry, and Pathophysiology of MENX-Related Pheochromocytoma Recapitulate the Clinical Features. //Endocrinology. 2016 Aug;157(8):3157-66
- Winkelmann MT, Gassenmaier S, Walter SS, Artzner C, Lades F, Faby S, Nikolaou K, Bongers MN. Differenti-ation of adrenal adenomas from adrenal metastases in single-phased staging dual-energy CT and radiomics. //Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022 May;28(3):208-216.
- Komarowska H, Malinska A, Komekbai Z, Brominska B, Bednarek-Rajewska K, Ruchala M, Rucinski M. Immunohistochemical analysis of ghrelin expression in various types of ad-renal tumors. //Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2021;59(2):86-94
file
download