44 -9 (95) 2026 - Sh.B. G'ulyamov, Sh.I. Inagamov - BOLALARDA TASHQI ESHITUV YO'LINING TUG'MA ATREZIYASIDA ELEKTROMAGNIT NAVIGATSIYA TIZIMIDAN FOYDALANISH: KLINIK IMKONIYATLAR VA NATIJALARI

BOLALARDA TASHQI ESHITUV YO'LINING TUG'MA ATREZIYASIDA ELEKTROMAGNIT NAVIGATSIYA TIZIMIDAN FOYDALANISH: KLINIK IMKONIYATLAR VA NATIJALARI

Sh.B. G'ulyamov, Sh.I. Inagamov - Bolalar Milliy Tibbiyot Markazi

Rezyume

Bolalarda tashqi eshituv yo'lining (TEY) tug'ma atreziyasini jarrohlik tuzatishda Medtronic StealthStation™ S8 elektromagnit navigatsiya tizimidan foydalanish samaradorligini baholash. 2018–2025 yillar davomida Bolalar milliy tibbiyot markazida 38 nafar bolaga (yoshi 4–14, o'rtacha 7,3 ± 2,1 yosh) Medtronic StealthStation™ S8 tizimi yordamida jarrohlik amaliyoti bajarildi. Bir tomonlama atreziya — 68,4%, ikki tomonlama — 31,6%. Barcha bemorlarga 0,625–1 mm qatlamli MSKT o'tkazildi. 36 bemorда (94,7%) yuz nervi to'liq saqlandi; 2 (5,3%) da vaqtinchalik parezi 6–8 haftada to'liq tiklandi. Doimiy yuz falaji kuzatilmadi. Eshitish 12 oyda o'rtacha 28,4 dB ga yaxshilandi; 73,7% da air-bone gap ≤30 dB HL ga tushdi. Navigatsiya aniqligi 0,7 ± 0,2 mm. Elektromagnit navigatsiya tizimi yuz nervi asoratlarini minimumga tushiradi, eshitish natijalarini yaxshilaydi va murakkab anatomik hollarda ishonchli orientatsiya ta'minlaydi.

Kalit so'zlar: tashqi eshituv yo'li, tug'ma atreziya, elektromagnit navigatsiya, yuz nervi, bolalar otoxirurgiyasi.

First page

304

Last page

308

For citation:Sh.B. G'ulyamov, Sh.I. Inagamov - BOLALARDA TASHQI ESHITUV YO'LINING TUG'MA ATREZIYASIDA ELEKTROMAGNIT NAVIGATSIYA TIZIMIDAN FOYDALANISH: KLINIK IMKONIYATLAR VA NATIJALARI//New Day in Medicine 9(95)2026 304-308 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/9-95-2026

ADABIYOTLAR RO’YXATI

  1. Jahrsdoerfer RA, Yeakley JW, Aguilar EA, Cole RR, Gray LC. Grading system for the selection of patients with congenital aural atresia. Am J Otol. 1992;13(1):6–12. doi:10.1097/00129492-199201000-00004.
  2. Hausler R. General history of surgery on the external ear canal. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2002;59:1–10.
  3. De la Cruz A, Teufert KB. Congenital aural atresia surgery: long-term results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(1):121–127. doi:10.1016/S0194-5998(03)00531-X.
  4. Shonka DC Jr, Livingston WJ 3rd, Kesser BW. The Jahrsdoerfer grading scale in surgery to repair congenital aural atresia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(8):873–877. doi:10.1001/archotol.134.8.873.
  5. Caversaccio M, Freysinger W. Computer assistance for intraoperative navigation in ENT surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2003;12(1):36–51. doi:10.1080/13645700310001577.
  6. Schlöndorff G, Mösges R, Meyer-Ebrecht D, Krybus W, Adams L. CAS (computer assisted surgery). A new procedure in head and neck surgery. HNO. 1989;37(5):187–190.
  7. Citardi MJ, Batra PS. Intraoperative surgical navigation for endoscopic sinus surgery: rationale and indications. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;15(1):23–27. doi:10.1097/MOO.0b013e3280123130.
  8. Kösling S, Omenzetter M, Bartel-Friedrich S. Congenital malformations of the external and middle ear. Eur J Radiol. 2009;69(2):269–279. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.10.019.
  9. Fisch U. Tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy, and stapes surgery. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1994.
  10. Lampert P, Hausler R. Long-term audiological outcomes after surgery for congenital aural atresia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(4):991–998.

    file

    download