98 -9 (95) 2026 - Lutfullayeva U.A., Shukurov F.I. - BACHADON NAYLARI REKONSTRUKTIV JARROHLIGIDAN KEYIN FUNKSIONAL TIKLANISH VA REPRODUKTIV NATIJALAR: MORFOLOGIK MEXANIZMLAR VA KLINIK DALILLAR

BACHADON NAYLARI REKONSTRUKTIV JARROHLIGIDAN KEYIN FUNKSIONAL TIKLANISH VA REPRODUKTIV NATIJALAR: MORFOLOGIK MEXANIZMLAR VA KLINIK DALILLAR

Lutfullayeva U.A., Shukurov F.I. - Toshkent Davlat Tibbiyot Universiteti

Rezyume

Bachadon naylarining anatomik o’tkazuvchanligini tiklash har doim ham ularning transport funksiyasi va fertillik salohiyati to’liq tiklanganini anglatmaydi. Sharhning maqsadi bachadon naylari rekonstruktiv jarrohligidan keyingi funksional tiklanish va reproduktiv natijalarni bel-gilovchi morfologik, epitelial, immun va fibrotik mexanizmlarni klinik dalillar bilan bog’liq holda tahlil qilishdan iborat. Reproduktiv natijalar bemor yoshi, nay shikastlanishining og’irligi, fimbriya-lar va epiteliyning saqlanganligi, qoldiq nay uzunligi, gidrosalpinks, peritubar bitishmalar va bepushtlikning boshqa omillariga bog’liq. Kiprikchalar disfunksiyasi, epitelial qayta qurilish, mahal-liy immun javob va fibroz anatomik tiklanishdan keyin ham funksional yetishmovchilik saqlanishini tushuntiruvchi asosiy mexanizmlar sifatida qaraladi. Biroq ularni ifodalovchi markerlarning oper-atsiyadan keyingi tirik tug’ilishni individual prognozlash qiymati hozircha yetarlicha tasdiqlanma-gan. Klinik yondashuv operatsiya natijasini anatomik baholash bilan cheklanmasdan, juftlikning umumiy fertillik salohiyati, infeksiya, tuxumdon zaxirasi, sperma ko’rsatkichlari va reproduktiv vaq-tni hisobga olishi lozim. Immunomorfologik panellar hozircha tadqiqot vositasi bo’lib, tayyor klinik prognoz shkalasi yoki empirik immunoterapiyaga asos bo’la olmaydi. Kelgusi prospektiv tadqiqot-larda morfologik va funksional markerlarning an’anaviy klinik omillarga qo’shimcha prognostik qiymati tirik tug’ilish natijasi bo’yicha baholanishi zarur.

Kalit so’zlar: bachadon naylari, rekonstruktiv jarrohlik, funksional tiklanish, nay omiliga bog’liq bepushtlik, gidrosalpinks, morfologiya, fibroz, kiprikchalar.

First page

666

Last page

675

For citation:Lutfullayeva U.A., Shukurov F.I. - BACHADON NAYLARI REKONSTRUKTIV JARROHLIGIDAN KEYIN FUNKSIONAL TIKLANISH VA REPRODUKTIV NATIJALAR: MORFOLOGIK MEXANIZMLAR VA KLINIK DALILLAR//New Day in Medicine 9(95)2026 666-675 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/9-95-2026

ADABIYOTLAR RO’YXATI

1. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(5):1143-1150. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.01.051.
2. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility evaluation of infertile women: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(5):1255-1265. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.08.038.
3. Obrzut B, Obrzut M. Is there still a place for reconstructive surgery in distal tubal disease? J Clin Med. 2022;11(12):3278. doi:10.3390/jcm11123278.
4. Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of nar-rative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4:5. doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8.
5. Duffy JMN, Bhattacharya S, Bhattacharya S, Bofill M, Collura B, Curtis C, et al. Standardiz-ing definitions and reporting guidelines for the infertility core outcome set: an international consensus development study. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(12):2735-2745. doi:10.1093/humrep/deaa243.
6. Yuan L, Jingying H, Xiujuan C, Chengying L, Xiaochen H, Xiumei X, et al. Predictive value of a modified classification of fallopian tube status on prognosis of tubal factor infertility after laparoscopic surgery. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(13). doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000014952.
7. El-Kharoubi AF, Szasz F. Tubal blockage surgery: a retrospective cohort study on clinical characteristics and reproductive outcomes within six years. Cureus. 2023;15(6). doi:10.7759/cureus.39879.
8. de Souza RS, Berger GS. Fallopian tube anatomy predicts pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes after tubal reversal surgery. Stat Methods Med Res. 2021;30(8):2004-2014. doi:10.1177/09622802211023543.
9. Hao HJ, Wang ZH, Feng L, Zhao XL, Chen X. Which patients with hydrosalpinx will benefit more from reproductive surgery to improve natural pregnancy outcomes?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(8). doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000032806.
10. Yao WX, Zheng DZ, Liu WF, Zhou MM, Liu L, Cai MJ. Prognostic value of hysterosal-pingography after salpingostomy in patients with hydrosalpinx. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023;43(1):2158322. doi:10.1080/01443615.2022.2158322.

    file

    download