51 -5 (91) 2026 - D.T. Khodjieva, G.K. Khotamova - APHASIA: CONCEPT, POST-STROKE DEVELOPMENT MECHANISMS AND CURRENT CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION

APHASIA: CONCEPT, POST-STROKE DEVELOPMENT MECHANISMS AND CURRENT CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION

D.T. Khodjieva - Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sina

G.K. Khotamova - Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sina

Resume

Among all complications associated with acute cerebrovascular events, aphasia stands out as the most disabling acquired language disorder, affecting roughly one in three stroke survivors globally. The consequent loss of communicative function simultaneously undermines social participation, professional reintegration, and psychological well-being. Drawing on publications from 2021 to 2026, this systematic review examines the neuroanatomical substrate of language, the pathogenetic sequence that gives rise to post-stroke aphasia, and the clinical-neuropsychological classification frameworks currently applied in research and neurorehabilitation settings.

Keywords: aphasia, stroke, language centres, excitotoxicity, neuroplasticity, ischemic penumbra, clinical classification, neurorehabilitation.

First page

301

Last page

305

For citation:D.T. Khodjieva, G.K. Khotamova - APHASIA: CONCEPT, POST-STROKE DEVELOPMENT MECHANISMS AND CURRENT CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION//New Day in Medicine 5(91)2026 301-305 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/5-91-2026

List of References

  1. GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:795–820. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0.
  2. Owolabi MO, Thrift AG, Mahal A, et al. Primary stroke prevention worldwide: translating evidence into action. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7:e74–85. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00230-9.
  3. Grawburg M, Howe T, Worrall L, Scarinci N. The global rate of post-stroke aphasia. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2022. doi:10.1044/2022_PERSP-22-00111.
  4. Gronberg A, Henriksson I, Stenman M, Lindgren AG. Incidence of aphasia in ischemic stroke. Neuroepidemiology. 2022;56(3):174–182. doi:10.1159/000520607.
  5. RELEASE Collaborators. Predictors of poststroke aphasia recovery. Stroke. 2021;52(5):1778–1787. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031162.
  6. Northcott S, Simpson A, Moss B, et al. Aphasia and mental health: a systematic review. Aphasiology. 2021;35(10):1218–1248.
  7. Wilson SM, Schneck SM. Neuroplasticity in post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of functional imaging studies. Aphasiology. 2021;35(3):359–400. doi:10.1080/02687038.2019.1646809.
  8. Billot A, Kiran S. Disentangling neuroplasticity mechanisms in post-stroke language recovery. Brain Lang. 2024;251:105381. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105381.
  9. Kristinsson S, den Ouden DB, Rorden C, et al. Predictors of therapy response in chronic aphasia. J Stroke. 2022;24(2):189–206. doi:10.5853/jos.2022.01102.
  10. Zhao Y, Zhang X, Chen X, Wei Y. Neuronal injuries in cerebral infarction and ischemic stroke: from mechanisms to treatment. Int J Mol Med. 2022;49:15. doi:10.3892/ijmm.2021.5070.

    file

    download