• Главная
  • NEW DAY MEDICINE
  • 2 (88) 2026
  • 88 -2 (88) 2026 - Tolibjonova M.O., Yuldasheva O.S. - ANALYSIS OF RISK FACTORS AND PERINATAL OUTCOMES IN PREGNANT WOMEN AFTER IN VITRO FERTILIZATION: A COMBINED RETROSPECTIVE–PROSPECTIVE STUDY

88 -2 (88) 2026 - Tolibjonova M.O., Yuldasheva O.S. - ANALYSIS OF RISK FACTORS AND PERINATAL OUTCOMES IN PREGNANT WOMEN AFTER IN VITRO FERTILIZATION: A COMBINED RETROSPECTIVE–PROSPECTIVE STUDY

ANALYSIS OF RISK FACTORS AND PERINATAL OUTCOMES IN PREGNANT WOMEN AFTER IN VITRO FERTILIZATION: A COMBINED RETROSPECTIVE–PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Tolibjonova M.O. - Andijan State Medical Institute

Yuldasheva O.S. - Andijan State Medical Institute

Resume

Pregnancy achieved through in vitro fertilization (IVF) is associated with an increased risk of obstetric and perinatal complications. The aim of this study was to identify major risk factors affecting pregnancy course and perinatal outcomes after IVF, taking into account infertility etiology and maternal age. A combined retrospective–prospective analysis of 60 IVF pregnancies demonstrated that endocrine infertility and maternal age ≥40 years significantly increase the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, placental insufficiency, and fetal growth restriction. Doppler ultrasound of uteroplacental circulation was identified as the most informative method for early prediction of placental dysfunction.

Keywords: in vitro fertilization, infertility factors, maternal age, perinatal outcomes, placental dysfunction

First page

452

Last page

454

For citation:Tolibjonova M.O., Yuldasheva O.S. - ANALYSIS OF RISK FACTORS AND PERINATAL OUTCOMES IN PREGNANT WOMEN AFTER IN VITRO FERTILIZATION: A COMBINED RETROSPECTIVE–PROSPECTIVE STUDY//New Day in Medicine 2(88)2026 452-454 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/2-88-2026

List of References

  1. Savelyeva G.M., Shalina R.I., Panina O.B. Obstetrics. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2021.
  2. Radzinsky V.E., Fuks A.M. Reproductive Technologies and High-Risk Pregnancy. Moscow; 2020.
  3. Adamson G.D., de Mouzon J., Chambers G.M. International trends in assisted reproductive technology. Fertility and Sterility. 2018;110(3):456–464.
  4. Luke B., Brown M.B. Elevated risks of pregnancy complications in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2019;134(4):845–855.
  5. Pinborg A., Wennerholm U.B., Romundstad L.B. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction have adverse perinatal outcomes? Human Reproduction Update. 2019;25(1):87–104.
  6. Qin J., Sheng X., Wu D. Pregnancy-related complications and perinatal outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:11690.
  7. Santulli P., et al. Adverse obstetric outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technologies. Human Reproduction. 2021;36(2):436–444.
  8. Declercq E., Luke B., Belanoff C. Advanced maternal age, assisted reproduction, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Fertility and Sterility. 2020;113(3):560–568.
  9. Cavoretto P., et al. Role of uterine artery Doppler in pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2021;57(2):314–322.
  10. La Marca A., Sunkara S.K. Individualization of IVF treatment and pregnancy outcomes. Human Reproduction Update. 2020;26(4):507–525.

    file

    download