1 -4 (54) 2023 — S.A. Mukhtorova, D.T. Kayumova — ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH FAILED INDUCTION OF LABOR

ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH FAILED INDUCTION OF LABOR

S.A. Mukhtorova, Tashkent Medical Academy, Uzbekistan

D.T. Kayumova, Tashkent Medical Academy, Uzbekistan

I.A. Kamilova Tashkent Medical Academy, Uzbekistan

Resume

The purpose of the study: to study the risk factors of failure of induction of labor with prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone) vaginal tablets. Research materials and methods: scientific research included 76 women with one pregnancy of 37-41 weeks. In women, labor was induced by 2 intravaginal tablets of prostaglandin E2 (Dinoprostone, 3mg). Examination methods: general clinical-laboratory, special obstetric examination, instrumental and statistical methods. Research results: 86.8% (66/76) of group 1 had vaginal delivery as a result of labor induction, and 13.2% (10/76) of group 2 had operative delivery (p<0.0001). There was no significant difference between neonatal outcomes. Conclusion: Induction of labor may be ineffective in cases of first birth, fetal weight more than 3500 g, immature cervix.

Key words: labor induction, Dinoprostone, prostaglandin E2, cervical ripening.

First page

2

Last page

5

For citation: S.A. Mukhtorova, D.T. Kayumova, I.A. Kamilova – ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH FAILED INDUCTION OF LABOR //New Day in Medicine 4(54)2023 2-6 https://goo.su/crjnC

LIST OF REFERENCES:

  1. WHO Recommendations for Induction of Labour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.[Link]
  2. Leduc D, Biringer A, Lee L, Dy J. Сlinical practice obstetrics committee, special contributors. Induction of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013; 35(9):840-57. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Grobman WA, Bailit J, Lai Y, Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, Varner MW, et al. Defining failed induction oflabor. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2018;218(1):122. e1- e8. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ajog.2017.11.556 PMID: 29138035
  4. Girma W, Tseadu F, Wolde M. Outcome of Induction and Associated Factors among Term and Post-Term Mothers Managed at Jimma University Specialized Hospital: A Two Yearsʻ Retrospective Analysis. Ethiopian journal of health sciences. 2016;26(2):123–32.Doi: https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v26i2.6.
  5. Hurissa BF GM, Belachew T. Prevalence of Failed Induction of Labor and Associated Factors Among Women Delivered in Hawassa Public Health Facilities, Ethiopia. Journal of Womenʻs Health Care. 2015;4:253.Doi: https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0420.1000253.
  6. Rouse DJ, Weiner SJ, Bloom SL, Varner MW, Spong CY, Ramin SM, et al. Failed labor induction toward an objective diagnosis. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2011;117(201):267. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318207887a PMID: 21252738
  7. Khan NB, Ahmed I, Malik A, Sheikh L. Factors associated with failed induction of labor in asecondary care hospital. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association: JPMA. 2012;62(1):6.
  8. Park KH, Hong JS, Ko JK, Cho YK, Lee CM, Choi H, et al. Comparative study of induction of labor in nulliparous women with premature rupture of membranes at term compared to those with intact membranes: duration of labor and mode of delivery. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research. 2006;32(5):482–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00443.x PMID: 16984515
  9. Banos N, Migliorelli F, Posadas E, Ferreri J, Palacio M. Definition of failed induction of labor and itspredictive factors: two unsolved issues of an everyday clinical situation. Fetal diagnosis and therapy. 2015;38(3):161–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000433429 PMID: 26138441
  10. Gabbay-Benziv R, Hadar E, Ashwal E, Chen R, Wiznitzer A, Hiersch L. Induction of labor: doesindication matter? Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2016; 294(6):1195–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4171-1 PMID: 27501927
  11. Schoen C, Navathe R, editors. Failed induction of labor. Seminars in perinatology; 2015; Elsevier.https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2015.07.013 PMID: 26341068

file

download