25 -1 (63) 2024 — O.М. Sariboev — METHODS FOR SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE CONDITION OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PAIN IN THE LUMBAR AND SACRAL REGION

METHODS FOR SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE CONDITION OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PAIN IN THE LUMBAR AND SACRAL REGION

O.М. Sariboev  Private clinic “SMS”, Uzbekistan, Andijan Province

Resume

Pain in the lumbar and sacral region is one of the most common symptoms in patients with outpatient visits. At the same time, the inability to quantitatively measure pain prevents an objective assessment of the patient’s condition. Numerous scales and questionnaires have been proposed as a solution to this problem. The purpose of this review was to study these scales and questionnaires, identify their disadvantages and advantages, and create practical recommendations for their use.

Key words: pain, assessment, quality of life, scale, questionnaire

First page

127

Last page

132

For citation: O.М. Sariboev – METHODS FOR SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE CONDITION OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PAIN IN THE LUMBAR AND SACRAL REGION //New Day in Medicine 2024 1(63): 127-132 https://newdaymedicine.com/index.php/2024/01/15/l-753/

LIST OF REFERENCES:

1. Alemanno F, Houdayer E, Emedoli D, Locatelli M, Mortini P, Mandelli C, Raggi A, Iannaccone S. Efficacy of virtual reality to reduce chronic low back pain: Proof-of-concept of a non-pharmacological approach on pain, quality of life, neuropsychological and functional outcome. // PLoS One. May 23 2019; 14(5):e0216858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216858. PMID: 31120892; PMCID: PMC6532874.
2. Bellieni CV. The Limitations of Pain Scales. JAMA Pediatr. Jun 1 2020; 174(6):623. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0076. PMID: 32227135.
3. Euasobhon P, Atisook R, Bumrungchatudom K, Zinboonyahgoon N, Saisavoey N, Jensen MP. Reliability and responsivity of pain intensity scales in individuals with chronic pain. // Pain. Dec 1 2022; 163(12):e1184-e1191. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002692. Epub 2022 May 18. PMID: 35584261.
4. Fairbank JC. Oswestry disability index. // J Neurosurg Spine. Feb 2014; 20(2):239-41. doi: 10.3171/2013.7.SPINE13288. Epub 2013 Nov 22. PMID: 24266676.
5. Fairbank JC. Why are there different versions of the Oswestry Disability Index? // J Neurosurg Spine. Jan 2014; 20(1):83-6. doi: 10.3171/2013.9.SPINE13344. Epub 2013 Nov 8. PMID: 24206036.
6. Giordano V, Deindl P, Olischar M. The Limitations of Pain Scales-Reply. // JAMA Pediatr. Jun 1 2020; 174(6):623-624. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0079. PMID: 32478854.
7. Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, Dikme O. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use? // Am J Emerg Med. Apr 2018; 36(4):707-714. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 6. PMID: 29321111.
8. Martin CT, Yaszemski AK, Ledonio CGT, Barrack TC, Polly DW Jr. Oswestry Disability Index: Is Telephone Administration Valid? // Iowa Orthop J. 2019; 39(2):92-94. PMID: 32577114; PMCID: PMC7047302.
9. Olsson E, Ahl H, Bengtsson K, Vejayaram DN, Norman E, Bruschettini M, Eriksson M. The use and reporting of neonatal pain scales: a systematic review of randomized trials. // Pain. Feb 1 2021; 162(2):353-360. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002046. PMID: 32826760; PMCID: PMC7808360.
10. Schweizer L, Sieber R, Nickel CH, Minotti B. Ability of pain scoring scales to differentiate between patients desiring analgesia and those who do not in the emergency department. // Am J Emerg Med. Jul 2022; 57:107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.04.046. Epub 2022 May 5. PMID: 35550928.
11. Thong ISK, Jensen MP, Miró J, Tan G. The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure? // Scand J Pain. Jan 26 2018; 18(1):99-107. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0012. PMID: 29794282.
12. Zigler JE, Delamarter RB. Oswestry disability index. // J Neurosurg Spine. Feb 2014; 20(2):241-2. PMID: 24645201.