41 -1 (25/2) 2019 — Tuksanova D.I., Avakov V.E., — FEATURES OF THE STATE OF THE PARAMETERS OF HOMEOSTASIS AND CARDIO HEMODYNAMICS IN WOMEN WITH PHYSIOLOGICAL PREGNANCY

FEATURES OF THE STATE OF THE PARAMETERS OF HOMEOSTASIS AND CARDIO HEMODYNAMICS IN WOMEN WITH PHYSIOLOGICAL PREGNANCY

Tuksanova D.I., Bukhara State Medical Institute.

Avakov V.E., Bukhara State Medical Institute.

Nazhmutdinova D.K. Bukhara State Medical Institute.

Resume

Study of the features of the state of the parameters of homeostasis and cardio dynamics in the process of normal pregnancy. We studied 100 women with physiological pregnancy at 20-24, 28-32 weeks of gestation. Integrated ultrasound and Doppler blood flow study was performed, ultrasound scanner Sono-scape SSI 5000 (China model). To this end, we have studied the following parameters: EDD, IVS, PW, DA, LVM, LVMi, RWT and KD for judging the relationship of indices and the degree of proportionality, MMLV. With the progression of a normal pregnancy, changes occur in the geometry of the heart, expressed in an increase in the mass of the myocardium of various LV divisions, the linear dimensions of its cavities. However, these changes are almost insignificant, they reflect only general trends.

Keywords: Doppler, the criteria for the geometry of the heart, (MMLV, RWT), preeclampsia.

First page

159

Last page

162

For citation: Tuksanova D.I., Avakov V.E., Nazhmutdinova D.K. Features of the state of the parameters of homeostasis and cardio hemodynamics in women with physiological pregnancy//New Day in Medicine 1(25)2019 159-162 https://cutt.ly/LbFgwrT

List of References

1. Брянцев М. Д. Оценка центральной гемодинамики и органного кровотока при артериальной гипертензии в третьем тримес­тре беременности: дис. □ канд. мед. наук. – Иваново, 2010. – 192 с.
2. Сидорова И. С., Макарова И. О. Оценки степени тяжести гес- тозов (по данным литературы) // Акушерство и гинекология. – 2008. – №3. – С. 40-42.
3. Сидорова И. С., Зарубенко Н. Б., Гурина О. И. Маркеры дис­функции эндотелия при гестозе // Российский вестник аку­шера-гинеколога. – 2010. – №5. – Том 10. – С. 24-26.
4. Охапкин М. Б., Хитров М. В., Гурьев Д. Л., Брянцев М. Д. Особенности центральной гемодинамики как причина и воз­можная основа прогноза осложнений беременности // Рос­сийский вестник акушера-гинеколога. – 2011. – №4. – С. 73-76.
5. Barton J. R., Sibai B. M. Prediction and prevention of recurrent preeclampsia // Obstetrics and gynecology.Aug. – 2008. – Vol. 112, №2. – P. 359-372.
6. Bosio P. M, McKenna P. J., Conroy R., O’Herlihy C. Maternal central hemodynamics in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy // Obstet Gynecol. – 2009. – Vol. 94. – Р. 978-984.
7. Hubel C. A, Roberts J. M., Taylor R. N, Musci T. J, Rogers J. M, McLaughlin M. K. Lipid peroxidation in preeclampsia: new perspectives on preeclampsia // Am J Obstet Gynecol. – 2009. – Vol. 161. – Р. 1025-1034.
8. Naljayan M. V., Karumanchi S. A., New developments in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia // Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. – 2013. – Vol. 20, №3. – Р. 265-270.