• Home
  • NEW DAY MEDICINE
  • 2 (34) 2021
  • 83 -2 (34) 2021 — Rabiev S. N., Teshaev Sh. J., — FEATURES OF ANTHROPOMETRIC INDICATORS IN WOMEN OF DIFFERENT CONSTITUTIONAL TYPES

83 -2 (34) 2021 — Rabiev S. N., Teshaev Sh. J., — FEATURES OF ANTHROPOMETRIC INDICATORS IN WOMEN OF DIFFERENT CONSTITUTIONAL TYPES

FEATURES OF ANTHROPOMETRIC INDICATORS IN WOMEN OF DIFFERENT CONSTITUTIONAL TYPES

Rabiev S. N., Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali Ibn Sino, Bukhara, Republic of Uzbekistan.

Teshaev Sh. J., Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali Ibn Sino, Bukhara, Republic of Uzbekistan.

Khakimboyeva K. A. Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali Ibn Sino, Bukhara, Republic of Uzbekistan.

Resume

The article is devoted to the study of the features of anthropometric indicators in women of different constitutional types. One of the important indicators that determine the course of labor is growth. This shows that the number of complications during pregnancy and childbirth is directly related to the woman’s constitution.

Key words: constitutional type, anthropometry, pregnancy, childbirth, somatotype, dolichomorph, brachymorph va mesomorph.

First page

436

Last page

442

For citation: Rabiev S. N., Teshaev Sh. J., Khakimboyeva K. A. Features of anthropometric indicators in women of different constitutional types //New Day in Medicine 2(34)2021 436-442 https://cutt.ly/qn2KR2I

LIST OF REFERENCES

  1. Воеводин С. М. Значение и особенности применения 3D/4D ультразвука для исследования плода // SonoAce-Ultrasound – 2008. – № 18. – С. 15-22.
  2. Савельева Г. М., Сухих Г. Т., Манухин И. Б. Гинекология // Национальное руководство – М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2013. – 704 с.
  3. Титченко Л.  И., Пырсикова Ж.  Ю., Чечнева М.  А., Титченко И.  П.   Трехмерное  ультразвуковое  исследование  для функциональной  оценки  внутриплацентарной  сосудистой  сети  //  Sono Ace Ultrasound. – 2007. – N16. – С. 22-27.
  4. Аhman, A.Two sides of the same coin-an interview study of Swedish obstetricians’ experiences usingultrasound in pregnancy management / A. Ahman, M. Persson, K. Edvardsson, A. Lalos, S. Graner, R. Small, I. Mogren //BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. – 2015.- Vol. 20. – P.304-315.
  5. Arya Sushila and Sanya Kupesic Plavsic. 2017. “Preimplantation 3D ultrasound: current use and problems.- Journal of perinatal medicine. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages 745–758 https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2016-0361.
  6. Auerbach  Benjamin M., Catherine A. king, Ryan M. Campbell, meadow L. Campbell, and Adam D. Sylvester. 2018. “Changes in the obstetric size of the human pelvis depending on the age of death and latitude.- American journal of physical anthropology. Р.236-90 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23690.
  7. Sonographic detection of central nervous system defects in the first trimester of pregnancy /A.C. Engels, L. Joyeux, C. Brantner, B. De Keersmaecker, L. De Catte, D. Baud, J. Deprest, T. Van Mieghem // Prenat Diagn.  – 2016.- Vol. 36, N3.- P. 266-273.
  8. Öcal, D.F. The place of four-dimensional ultrasound in evaluating fetal anomalies/ D.F. Öcal, T. Nas, I. Güler //Ir. J. Med. Sci.- 2015.- Vol.184,N 3.-P.607-612. 
  9. Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging workshop / U.M. Reddy, A.Z. Abuhamad, D. Levine, G.R. Saade //Obstet. Gynecol. -2014.- Vol.123, N5.- P.1070-1082.
  10. 4D ultrasound study of fetal facial expressions at 20-24 weeks of gestation / M. Sato, K. Kanenishi, U. Hanaoka, J. Noguchi, G. Marumo, T. Hata //Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. -2014.- Vol.126, N3.- P.275-279.
  11. Fetal volume measurements with three dimensional ultrasound in the  first trimester of pregnancy, related to pregnancy outcome, a prospective cohort study / N.A. Smeets, M. Prudon, B. Winkens, S.G. Oei //BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. -2012.- Vol. 28.- p. 12:38. 
  12. Fetal biometry: does patient ethnicity matter? / L.I. Parikh, J. 3rd Nolan, E. Tefera, R. Driggers // J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. – 2014.- Vol. 27, N5.- P.500-504.
  13. Fetal Biometry in the Israeli Population: New Reference Charts / E. Daniel-Spiegel, M. Mandel, D. Nevo, A. Ben-Chetrit, O. Shen, E. Shalev, S. Yagel // Isr. Med. Assoc. J.- 2016.- Vol.18, N1.-40-44.
  14. Khamdamova M. T., Tukhtasinovna K. M. Echographic features variability in the size and shape of the uterus and ovaries in women of the second period of adulthood using various contraceptives //Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research (AJMR). – 2020. – Т. 9. – №. 5. – С. 259-263.
  15. Khamdamova M. T. Age and individual variability of the shape and size of the uterus according to morphological and ultrasound studies //Problems of biology and medicine. – 2020. – №. 1. – С. 116.
  16. Khamdamova M. T. Аnthropometric characteristics of thephysical status of women in the firstand second period of middle age //New day in medicine. – 2020. – №. 1. – С. 29.
  17. Хамдамова М. Т. Возрастная и индивидуальная изменчивость формы и размеров матки по данным морфологического и ультразвукового исследований // Проблемы биологии и медицины. – 2020. – №. 1. – С. 116.

file

download