• Home
  • NEW DAY MEDICINE
  • 2 (30) 2020
  • 35 -2 (30) 2020 — Klicheva R.I., Rahimbayeva G.S., — FRONTAL EPILEPSY — CLINICAL FEATURES AND CONNECTION WITH LATERALIZATION OF EPILEPTOGENIC FOCUS

35 -2 (30) 2020 — Klicheva R.I., Rahimbayeva G.S., — FRONTAL EPILEPSY — CLINICAL FEATURES AND CONNECTION WITH LATERALIZATION OF EPILEPTOGENIC FOCUS

FRONTAL EPILEPSY – CLINICAL FEATURES AND CONNECTION WITH LATERALIZATION
OF EPILEPTOGENIC FOCUS

Klicheva R.I. -Andijan State Medical Institute, 110000 Uzbekistan, Andijan Navoii avenyu 126 http://adti.uz.

Rahimbayeva G.S. -Andijan State Medical Institute, 110000 Uzbekistan, Andijan Navoii avenyu 126 http://adti.uz.

Nasriddinova N.A. -Andijan State Medical Institute, 110000 Uzbekistan, Andijan Navoii avenyu 126 http://adti.uz.

Resume,

Frontal epilepsy is a large and heterogeneous group of various epileptic syndromes which presents significant difficulties for diagnosis and treatment. Nowadays, frontal lobar epilepsy takes the 2nd place among the symptomatic forms of epilepsy after temporal lobe. The frontal parts of a brain in human occupy the 1st place in terms of area and variety of functions performed, it explains the variety of clinical manifestations. Frontal epilepsy can appear with unusual symptoms that remains manifestations of mental illness or sleep disorders. The causes of developing frontal epilepsy are different. For the successful treatment of this complex form of epilepsy, an integrated approach is needed- modern diagnostic methods including MRI research, EEG video monitoring of night sleep.

Keywords: Epilepsy, electroencephalography, epileptogenic focus, focus lateralization, epileptic attack, cognitive interruptions.

First page

146

Last page

150

For citation: Klicheva R.I., Rahimbayeva G.S., Nasriddinova N.A., Frontal epilepsy – clinical features and connection with lateralization of epileptogenic focus//New Day in Medicine 2(30)2020 146-150 https://cutt.ly/PcQRs1r

List of References

  1. Белая И.И. Межпароксизмальные клинико-психопатологичес­кие особенности больных эпилепсией с преимущественным поражением левого и правого полушария головного мозга: дисс. канд. мед. наук. М. 1981.
  2. Бочаров В.В., Вассерман Л.И. Медикопсихологические аспек­ты эмоциональных нарушений при височной эпилепсии: Возрастные аспекты реабилитации больных с эпилепсией. Л. 1984; 98-104.
  3. Гусев Е.И., Коновалов А.Н., Бурд Г.С. Неврология и нейро­хирургия. Москва, Медицина, 2000.
  4. Докукина Т.В., Голубева Т.С., Матвейчук И.В., Махров М.В., Лосева В.М., Крупенькина Е.В., Марчук С.А. Результаты фар- макоэпидемиологического исследования эпилепсии в Бело­руссии. ФАРМАКОЭКОНОМИКА. //Современная Фармако­экономика и Фармакоэпидемиология. 2014; 7 (2): 33-37.
  5. Зверева З.Ф. Характер межполушарного распределения мощ­ности биопотенциалов головного мозга в норме и при его латерализованном поражении: /Автореф. дисс. докт. мед. наук. М. 2004; 36.
  6. Зенков Л.Р. Клиническая эпилептология. – МИА, 2002.
  7. Зенков Л.Р., Ронкин. М.А. Функциональная диагностика не­рвных болезней. //Руководство для врачей. – 3-е изд. – М.: МЕД пресс-информ, 2004.
  8. Карлов В.А. Неврология. /М.: “Медицинское информационное агенство”, 1999.
  9. Рогачевой Т.А. Закономерности становления и течения ре­миссии при эпилепсии: /дисс. докт. мед. наук. М. 2006.
  10. Aarts E, Roelofs A, van Turennout M. Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: Brain activity and reaction time distributions. Neuropsychologia. 2009; 47(10): 2089-2099. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.019
  11. Bell G.S., Neligran A., Sander J.W. An unknown quantity – the worldwide prevalence of epilepsy. //Epilepsia. 2014; 55 (7): 958­962.
  12. Bari A, Robbins T. Inhibition and impulsivity: Behavioral and neural basis of response control. //Progress in Neurobiology. 2013; 108: 44-79. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.005
  13. Brunoni A, Vanderhasselt M. Working memory improvement with noninvasive brain stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis. //Brain and Cognition. 2014; 86: 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2014.01.008
  14. . Brass M, Ullsperger M, Knoesche T, Cramon D, Phillips N. Who Comes First? The Role of the Prefrontal and Parietal Cortex in Cognitive Control.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2005; 17(9): 1367-1375. doi:10.1162/0898929054985400
  15. Bari A, Robbins T. Inhibition and impulsivity: Behavioral and neural basis of response control. //Progress in Neurobiology. 2013; 108: 44-79. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.005
  16. Brandt J., Scidman L., and Kohl D. Personality characteristics of epileptic patients a controlled study of generalized and temporal lobe cases. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychology. 1985; 7: 25-38.
  17. Corcoran R, Upton D. A Role for the Hippocampus in Card Sorting? Cortex. 1993; 29(2): 293-304. doi:10.1016/s0010- 9452(13)80182-7
  18. Devinsky O, Morrell M, Vogt B. Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain. 1995; 118(1): 279-306. doi: 10.1093/ brain/118.1.279
  19. Devinsky O. The myth of silent cortex and the morbidity of epileptogenic tissue: Implications for temporal lobectomy. Epilepsy & Behavior. 2005; 7(3): 383-389. doi: 10.1016/ j. yebeh.2005.07.020
  20. Eshel N, Nelson E, Blair R, Pine D, Ernst M. Neural substrates of choice selection in adults and adolescents: Development of the ventrolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices. Neuropsychologia. 2007; 45(6): 1270-1279. doi: 10.1016/ j. neuropsychologia.2006.10.004

file

download