144 -5 (79) 2025 - M.S. Usarov, Z.E. Zhumanov - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSTICS AND MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF UTERINE DISEASES

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSTICS AND MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF UTERINE DISEASES

M.S. Usarov - Samarkand State Medical University

Z.E. Zhumanov - Samarkand State Medical University

O.A. Khamidov - Samarkand State Medical University

Resume

Uterine diseases represent one of the most relevant problems of women's health, significantly affecting reproductive function and reducing quality of life. Although ultrasound examination is a widely used method for diagnosing uterine pathology, its diagnostic accuracy compared to morphological examination varies significantly for different pathologies. This study aims to identify the relationship between the results of ultrasound diagnostics and morphological examination, which allows improving the accuracy of diagnosis and optimizing patient management algorithms

Keywords: ultrasound diagnostics, morphological examination, uterine diseases, myoma, endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial polyp, uterine cancer

First page

719

Last page

724

For citation:M.S. Usarov, Z.E. Zhumanov, O.A. Khamidov - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSTICS AND MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF UTERINE DISEASES//New Day in Medicine 5(79)2025 719-724 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/5-79-2025

List of References

1. Адамян Л.В., Андреева Е.Н., Артымук Н.В. и др. Миома матки: диагностика, лечение и реабилитация. Клинические рекомендации. М.: Медицина, 2022; 96 с.
2. Stewart E.A., Laughlin-Tommaso S.K., Catherino W.H., et al. Uterine fibroids. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2021; 7(1): 74-91.
3. World Health Organization. Global health estimates: Leading causes of disease burden in women. Geneva: WHO, 2022; p. 121-135.
4. Leone F.P.G., Timmerman D., Bourne T., et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of the endometrium and intrauterine lesions: a consensus opinion from the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) group. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2020; 46(3): 284-298.
5. Benson C.B., Doubilet P.M. The history of imaging in obstetrics. Radiology. 2018; 287(3): 717-725.
6. Van den Bosch T., Dueholm M., Leone F.P., et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2019; 46(3): 284-298.
7. Озерская И.А. Ультразвуковая диагностика в гинекологии. 3-е изд. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2021; 704 с.
8. Чечнева М.А., Капустина М.В., Краснова И.А. Ультразвуковая диагностика патологии эндометрия и миометрия. М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2020; 224 с.
9. Timmerman D., Valentin L., Bourne T.H., et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018; 46(3): 284-298.
10. Kurman R.J., Carcangiu M.L., Herrington C.S., Young R.H. WHO Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC, 2020; 307 p.

    file

    download